All Channels
Popular

Smacktard

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 48400

So, if you abandon the players that made the game popular, you sell more copies?

Cause, uh, compare:

http://www.vgchartz.com/gam...
http://www.vgchartz.com/gam...
http://www.vgchartz.com/gam......

5871d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Oh man, I have a few of these at home. They're called "books"

5873d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

They already did. It's called Halo.

5886d ago 23 agree7 disagreeView comment

I love how Sony fanboys often make baseless and outright incorrect accusations without doing any research at all.

No, wait, I hate that, and it's this kind of bull that's plaguing N4G and has been since forever.

5886d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Some guy mentioned it already: everything in the OU tier of Smogon.

Pokemon you can get in-game in HG/SS, before the Elite 4 and without trading? Without thinking too hard: Heracross, Gyarados, Jolteon, Vaporeon, Dragonite, Mamoswine.

5891d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I know what the list is about, and at this, the list fails. All of the pokemon I mentioned are terrible for competitive battling. Look it up on Smogon.

5891d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, seeing as how Charizard is terrible for competitive battling...

But then again, the list has Slaking, Typhlosion, Dunsparce, Steelix and Nidoking, making it the worst list I've ever seen. And I've been on N4G for a LONG time...

5891d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

>Sony thrown into a leading market position
>3rd place out of 3 major competitors
>they were first before this gen (if going on sales alone)
>lolwut

Pull up your pants, article, as well as 98% of the users of N4G. Your fanboy is showing.

5897d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

ToS: DotNW? Are you SERIOUS? I like the Tales Of formula, but DotNW was an absolutely terrible game. I mean, I enjoyed it, but it's terribly made, the characters, VA, and dialogue is absolutely ATROCIOUS, and it's only half of what a Tales Of game should be. There's so many better options, like de Blob or Red Steel 2 or basically ANYTHING really.

5899d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Because games are rated relevant to the console they're on, not compared to every other console, goddamn, that is just stupid logic.

5901d ago 10 agree0 disagreeView comment

EXTRA EXTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT: THIS JUST IN: NEWS FROM MONTHS AGO.

5903d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

How the hell did this article get published? Guarantee that if it was anti-PS3 it wouldn't have gotten published. I f**king hate this place sometimes.

5904d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

It's pretty obvious that GameStooge is just a Nintendo -- especially Wii -- basher.

If Wii games needed 1 mil to be profitable (as the article says Reggie said, which is a hypothetical proposition he put forward to use as an example, and not the real scenario), then de Blob, No More Heroes , and many other Wii games would not have been considered huge successes.

5905d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm looking forward to this game, but the hero looks like the same girly-boy loose, floating clothing-wearing type we've been sick of for years. What happened to shining armor and badassery?

5906d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

ShadowFlare: I agree with you, except on your last point. If this video is any indication, they CAN screw up the game badly.

5907d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

No! Guys! You don't get it! That doesn't work because those aren't Nintendo consoles, guys! You're doing it wrong!

5907d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

I like how he uses numbers without employing logic, too.

MY NUMBERS ARE BIGGER THAN YOURS!

5907d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Confirmed: This game is going to be bad, then.

5912d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

must be because it's not selling hurrrr good games dont sell on wii derrp

5914d ago 1 agree6 disagreeView comment

So... why is this article attacking the Wii, when the PS3 has been said by many to have an inferior Netflix service?

Oh, right...

5914d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment