This game has been in development for 4 and 1/2 years. Starting roughly the same time as star citizen in 2012. But people give star citizen flak for taking this long. Only difference is they had to announce it at the start to receive funds for SC.
Not trying to start trouble, but I thought I saw a lot of bias towards SC and this pretty much confirms it.
Hang their practices.
https://media.giphy.com/med...
Are we taking bets that the progression system to unlock items will center around credits that will unlock loot "crates" "boxes" "cards" or any other term they can come up with?
Game has high quality, sure. But the fact remains the progression system is terribly uninspired and presents nothing different from other grindy games. The game is obviously built around MT's, instead of MT's being implemented around the game. Which brings the justified outrage IMO.
"Judging by their figures, players will have to wade through 40 hours of multiplayer action before they can unlock Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker, who cost 60000 credits. For each match of Galactic Assault, players can earn 250 credits. If you’re playing ten minutes per round, that all adds up to a lot of forced playtime. Additionally, a Trooper Crate, which gives players new items and Star Cards, costs 4000 credits. With microtransactions in the game’s absolutely unapproachable economy ...
Uh oh, this is a battle they won't be able to win.
I hope not
They don't hear you moldy. They want 200+ million dollar games for $60 flat rate and you better not ask them to spend a penny more.
That would be great. Ive been wanting this for years.
"To conclude, Super Mario Odyssey has a lot of the sexist trademarks of the Mario franchise. In order to play the game, I had to accept that I was going to have to put up with some sexist depictions of women. But, where typically there aren’t a lot of bright spots in the series’, in this aspect, I actually could find some things to appreciate about the way the game handles Peach’s agency. And, damn if Pauline isn’t really cool. It’d be great if this franchise could start to go beyond hel...
I hope not, so much promise.
If it is a 3d remake of red/blue then yes, it will be better than mario/zelda. But that is a loooong shot. Definitely possible, but a long shot at this point.
I'm not here to defend MS's exclusive count..but to say Halo5 is it is just lazy on your end and not worthy of an actual response.
Yeah, poor sweet innocent sony.
Eh, I wouldn't say that. I would first look up how interviews are conducted and then share your thawts.
How did u not know the season pass was there?! Its $50
Probably the spawning on any squad member, health-regen, vehicle health regen, vehicle ammo regen, commander role reduced to fud, no assets to destroy on the battlefield, etc etc.
Lol, bad company 2 was the greatest to a lot of people because those who say that didn't play BF2 on PC or 2142 on PC.
Starting with bf3, they began to dumb down the game with health regen, vehicle health regen, squad spawn...on and on the list goes.
NOT TO SAY bad company 2 was a bad game, it was just no where near the peak of the Battlefield franchise in 2004/2005.
All of this is so petty guys lol. Can we just enjoy games whether its 720 or 12k <3
Is this the new MMO they are working on? Might be different considering its an mmo.