The Wii won, with the PS3 in close 2nd.
No More Heroes 2
Tatsunoko vs. Capcom
Red Steel 2
Truama Team
Monster Hunter 3
Super Mario Galaxy 2 (Highest rated game of 2010 so far)
Sin and Punishment 2
Endless Ocean 2
Sky Crawlers
Again, this is just my opinion, but damn, it's a pretty well backed-up one xD
All they could come up with was 3 reasons? That's not very convincing IMO.
2nd one was disappointing IMO. Not a bad game, not nearly, just didn't live up to the first.
I think Conduit 2 will come out on top when it comes to the one being played the most. It has more features than the other 2 games, like splitscreen co-op, online co-op, LAN, etc.
Us Wii owners are going to be broke. There's even a bunch of games confirmed for 2011, like Zelda and Kirby and Pikmin 3.
So it's a ripoff of a ripoff? Nice.
Sad
It would be great if they did. Hm, they might, considering the fact that they can look at the 360 and how it's limited by it's disk space. Let's hope.
lol
Actually, Super Mario Galaxy 2 is the highest rated game of the year. Just sayin..........
The Wii especially doesn't have to worry about this simply due to the fact that it's a Nintendo system. They'll always have their exclusive franchises like Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Fire Emblem, DK, Pikmin, F-Zero, Starfox, Pokemon, Kirby, Kid Icarus, etc. But the same goes for Sony. They have so many studios that they own, that they'll always have a guaranteed flow of exclusives.
This guy is either dumb, or he's only looking at the 360. Not to bash it or a...
Black Ops it's really such an easy game to beat when it comes to gameplay, stability, and general balance. Goldeneye 007 this year will top it >_<
So he says this because he feels that a developer working on one system can't succeed? Bungee? Naughty Dog? GG? The thing is, exclusives TEND TO BE higher quality than multi-plats, so they're still successful although they're only on one console. Heck, there's plenty of exclusives that sell just as much or more than multiplats (ex: Wii Fit, any Halo game, New Super Mario Bros Wii, MGS4)
Plus, exclusivity is mainly what defines a console. If every dev were to...
Lol, who are the 5 people who disagreed? You people must be those mindless blind sheep that idiotically buy every single FPS that you see every single year. But thanks for the disagrees - they show me that Im ownin people's minds.
There shouldn't be any "additions", because that word implies that it's the exact same game, with a few new things added to it. It should be it's own game, a new game, not something revamped with new improvements. (unless it's a remake of course)
Show me changes. Show me revolution. Show me the next level. Don't keep giving me the same crap with whip-cream and a cherry added to it.
Scorpion is beast, but it's all about that Jax! Cause he's black!
My last sports game was NBA 2k2 =/
There's nothing wrong with picking sides as long as it's for valid reasons. Like, "I don't like the 360 because it's broken on me 5 times" or "The Wii isn't strong enough for me. I enjoy HD and standard control schemes"
I agree. Im a Wii fan, so I would love to see it on Wii, but for the benefit of the game, I agree that it should be on the PS3 instead. Kingdom Hearts doesn't need to go motion control, and it could be a great chance to have even bigger wide open environments, like the Lion King level.
Watch Peter M. call this one "rubbish" as well.