PS3 version looks better because its not in engine mode.Its finished stuff while 360 and PC are running in editor,thus BOTH looking different.You can see that 360 version looks like PC,while ps3 has better lightning,textures but is not in engine,hence gun in it.
They will be identical,one site(vg247)said they looked it EXACTLY the same.
Im just stating what they and people who saw it said.Heres what this site says...
http://www.computerandvideo...
"Crysis 2 is the best looking game on console. Boom."
The other day they say that they still have to add extra details and they are in pre alpha,they also stated they will deliver visuals that will not be easy to excel,and they are both identica...
Well they said its will be the best looking game on consoles,and that it will eclipse everything to date,now both look identical?Does that meant that 360 version will look better then KZ2 and UC2??:)
Yes it does...
What i dont understand is,why does he talk of ND like they are 3rd party and they chosen ps3 because they only could make UC2 on ps3.He is huge fanboy,but how come he dont know that ND is SONYs property for like 10yrs?
This will get ugly...
Oh...HHG... :S
Me thinks its gonna be best looking game across all platforms...
I cant believe that they been able to put so much detail in open world game :O
Amazing game,day one!!!
I like UC2 look better(beautiful vistas,amazing textures,animations,all around polish and consistency)but man GOW III is super duper epic,scale and game looks smooth as f***(MLAA).
To me KZ2 is still the most technically advanced game on consoles,but you gotta give it to Sony and their 1st party for making such incredible looking games on console.Kudos to SM,GG and ND ;)
Never did i see better looking open world game on consoles,it looks freakin amazing.
I would not bet on Gears 3,although it seems like they polsihed UC3(better aa,lightning and foliage) but its pretty realistic to expect that Crysis 2 will look better(tech,developers rep and it comes year later).
LOL no 1080p for consoles.Although Crytek said they are aiming 720p 2xAA,that is pretty reasonable,should look great.
THIS.You are damn right,german stuff breeds with quality.From their machines to engines,cars and all the way to games everything is very polished and very very advanced in terms of technology.
Crysis is the game where you have all the freedom in the world and your actions must be pretty much thought in advance for most effective attacks,thats why its open ended.If you get it,its very very fun,if you dont it gets boring.It also has mp.
It will look better then Rage thats for sure,better then Doom 4?We will have to see.
After all Rage is running 60fps,they have 2x less time to render frame then Crytek does with Crysis 2(33ms for Crysis 2 and 16ms for Rage).
And how does Crysis gameplay suck?The game has AAA written all over itself.Its story is really dull,but gameplay,controls and graphics are all top notch.
I expect Crysis 2 to look the best on all 3 platforms.Seems to me like some people here want it to fail,at least on consoles,so they can claim exclusive graphics.
So looking forward to consoles running it on 1080p at 16xaa and 16xAF :P
On the real,no it will look by far the best on pc,but on consoles it will be best looking game this gen and everybody will be happy(except some fanboys).
Well thats all i need.Even if Crysis is physics heavy,it essentially is shader heavy,and shader=graphics.It will surely be interesting how it turns out.
I pasted cryengine 3 tech implantations and i didnt mean dynamic lightning is possible only on crysis 2,i meant about REAL TIME GLOBAL ILLUMINATION.
"You try to defend it with games that also run on the ps3? With people who hardly know how to program, and it still keeps up with insignificant performance problems? Despite some terrible multiplat with baked lighting running slightly better on the 360"
I see you are a smart a**.Did you just said that 90% of 3r...
Ah...i see some people are butthurth :D