There's like, a small handful of people TRYING to make a big deal of it.
Almost definitely not happening.
I've seen nothing saying it's timed, and given Sony's actually funding it via the China Hero Project I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up exclusive.
Dude, chill. No need to get so nasty.
Nah, PC fanboys who totally don't need those "peasant games" want it to die too.
So they can have access to those "inferior" games they totally wouldn't buy anyways, y'see.
I don't blame Sony for wanting more say in things; they almost exclusively footed the bill for R&D for their add-on.
It's funny: people were saying they'd opt to moneyhat more partnerships over investing more in first party studios, and now it's looking like they're doing exactly that.
About the only one really exclusive I care about is SSO. The rest I'm interested in I can just buy on PC.
So... eh, not sure what the point is anyways.
Or because he has legitimate complaints in there about how the games have had a negative impact as well?
He-uh... he has a legitimate gripe here.
There's nothing small-minded about this. People ditched his books because they think he's writing them based off the games now, and others stopped reading because they weren't based on the games. They started using game designs and graphics on the covers which don't always match up with his in-book descriptions. Etc.
What, is he supposed to just throw his vision to the side and be ultra happy that&#...
Because we totally needed the 6th CoD game set in WWII...
Freedom of Speech, the First Amendment, protect you from your Government, kiddos. Not private individuals. You're free to say whatever you want to say. That doesn't mean anyone else has to listen, or entertain the notion.
Does no one grasp this basic concept?
It's not. It's an act of consequence. They didn't take his Twitter or YouTube channel away. He can still speak to his heart's content.
"Rich blacks commit more crimes than poor whites and we should allow immigration only from compatible countries,"
Couple that with his comments about needing to defend a "white european heritage" and yeah, the dots connect pretty easily dude.
The irony is that his own beliefs would have denied his own parentage from having entered the country.
And If, and I do mean IF he's actually being serious about not meaning...
Yeah, here's the problem with these arguments:
1. No. That's not illegal. He wasn't dropped for being conservative or having conservative views, he was dropped for making racist comments during a live interview that he then went on Twitter and defended vehemently for days. And yes, they were racist comments. There's no real tapdancing around that at all. And these viewpoints, when expressed publicly on a forum such as this, are no longer your private, personal beliefs...
Uh, no. Racism is the belief that one race is inherently x, y, or z by nature of their genetics and skin tone. Racism is at the core of supremacy, but racism is not supremacy. I know many racists who have no problem with, say, Asians and black folks, but hate Latinos with a passion, say they're "dirty criminals", and so on. They don't believe their own race to be superior, simply that race to be undesirable.
And Jon's comments tread rather close to tha...
Yes, he totally forced Jon to say those words. Jon is completely innocent in the matter.
Completely. -_-
You're confusing racism with supremacy.
The difference is Jon actually kinda DID say some questionable stuff.
This is the second review to give it an 8 (or about an 8) but say it'd score higher were it on the Switch/portable.
Getting ridiculous.