How can someone disagree that its been Thursday for 12 hours in Europe?
I don't understand, its a European demo, its been Thursday for 12 hours in Europe!
:(
Yeah I have both and the PS3 is really bad when it comes to playing with friends, I cant understand how there is no private chat support while playing games?????????
No sh*t Sherlock
Even if its 2AM PST thats not till 10AM GMT :(
I dont get it it sounds like he really enjoyed playing the game?
Makes perfect sense, makes me wonder how any of the reviews have been able to "Review" the multiplayer aspect. Which is lets face 50% of a game nower days.
I've never really read gamespot, but they have just gone up in my opinion.
I'm sorry can't you play with 15 other players cooperatively against another team?
So they aint computers who cares, oh wait you can have bots?
Sp sucks on all games I only every play MP, I havn't even started SP on W@W and am on 2nd prestige.
KZ2 has everything you need and more, stop being greedy (or is it that bias thing again)
I agree 100% with this article.
These reviewers gave World at war (A re-skin of COD4 set in WW2, again) 83% for originality, and Killzone 2 77%, are they taking the pisss?
The next person to mention co-op is going to get a smack, who needs it if you've got a decent multiplayer?
Its a bonus not a requirement.
I'm pretty sure there is no splitscreen support, I think with the grpahics so high the PS3 just couldn't cope with split-screen.
Its all about balance, do you want better graphics or split-screen.
KZ2 made the right choice :)
Lol I didnt even read that bit of the review, seeing as is a massive plus point that you can have 32 players unlike COD's measily 18 (16 on most game types), quite funny how they missed that one off.
Funny though becuase I've seen other reviews saying it dosnt have enough players (becuase Resistance 2 has 60), I'd like to see them run 60 player servers with those graphics and watch CPU melt.
Remember reviewers are just normal people, though you'd think they'd not hir...
I dont understand, COD 1,UO,2,3,4,W@W are all pretty much the same, ok they've added bits and bobs but with over 6 releases of the game its stayed pretty much the same.
Gears of war 2 is pretty much the same as Gears 1, seriously theres minimal change between the 2.
They compare this game to the other FPS's, then mark Killzone 2 because its not original, it dons't make any sense. Its their fist game in years give them a chance. Think about it its their first next gen...
Stop saying killzowned and come up with your own saying instead of jumping on the bandwagon like everyone else.
Jeeze
Either your joking or saying that you will only ever playe "perfect games".
I guess you have your PS3 and 360 still in the wrapping, still waiting then?
:)
I don't understand the disagrees? Are you saying that I did know a demo was coming or that it won't tide me over till release?
"but I want it known from the outset I think this is an excellent game. It's absolutely one of the most impressive looking current-gen titles, and has a plethora of great combat ideas thrown into a solid mix of tried and tested gameplay formulas"
And you give it an 8.9?
Go back and look at Gears of War 2, the are flat textures everywhere, and things that look really bad (Animations of things blowing up or being destroyed). The KZ2 comes out which looks 10x ...
Wow I didn't think we were getting a demo, sweeeet should tide me over till release :)
Haha very funny @ second disagree