I thought 1943 was pretty good value for money.
They said in the interview that they're focusing on releasing solid versions on all platforms. Also, I think DICE has earned themselves quite a lot of freedom from EA with their success.
HAHA! Good one.
For all those who disagree: it was a joke. Lighten up.
They're doing something more with co-op than just adding another player to the campaign.
Would be awesome if you're in the same vehicle, one player is the drier, the other the gunner.
Agree. Or the "exclusive" items could be items that can be unlocked later one, but if you pre-order at that store, you get the items earlier on.
@ZBlacktt: True, but just because everyone is doing it, it doesn't make it less frustrating for gamers.
But it's still kinda frustrating to know that you can only have a certain gun by pre-order at a certain store. You can't buy them later on as DLC or unlock them by playing.
Haha, just in time for the Olympics -- oh wait.
Indeed.
And that Bobby Kotick didn't get to play BF3 at E3.
I was surprised too that they didn't showcase the 360 version at E3. BF3 is 4 months away and they don't have a working 360 version? Not even enough to show it off?
I've yet to check out Super Mario 3DS. When is the release date?
The size makes sense because there's a large screen. The size made no sense on the original Xbox controller.
We'll have to wait for the specs. DICE has said the 360 and PS3 aren't powerful enough to handle more than 24 players.
It's interesting how polished all the BF3 footage looks and yet they still say it's in "alpha" stages.
Sweet. Hopefully Sony will have some actual news, unlike Microsoft.
Nice job, keep the news coming!
Fighting games in general are in dire need of innovation.
less than 20 hours to go :)
Battlefield 3 took all the attention from ArmA 3 and other shooters. ArmA 3 shouldn't even have been at E3 due to the stiff competition from BF3 and MW3. They should've done something interesting, something for the fans -- maybe in association with E3.