At least they didn't get the worst Justin wong......among Justin wongs he could be the best lol
Edit: originally put Justin long.....now there's a guy that sucks
It's simple. There's a lot of negativity and frustration out there, and making a statement now would deflect that negative energy towards microsoft. They'll wait until It's up if at all.
Get out of here short hair fanboy! lol
lol....what the fu£k.....whatever you're on I want some. :$
Eh....who knows. Brink was going to sell more on 360 anyway, but we'll see sites using that as proof. Maybe Sony will see an increase in sales for single player games?
No sir....I refuse to click more than 3 times per article.
To attract the xbox fanboys who call everyone ps3 fanboys and calling the system or games trash.
Ps3 fanboys will come and defend the ps3 and its games and attack the xbox fanboys.
Rinse and repeat.
That's the way n4g works.
Spread over 13 pages........lol no.... not going through that trouble.
And now:
"Exclusive Games aren't needed"
lol....fanboys are pretty funny. Personally I want MORE exclusives, as usually they compliment or exceed third party efforts.
The same reason why the first twenty posts are being hidden.
lol......take their credit card data Anon 2.
Oh and.....: "whoever wins, we lose"
I agree it should, but they just let anyone submit all Willy nilly. If you have less than two or three bubbles, you're a fanboy or an idiot and should not be allowed to submit either way.
Edit: and...I rest my case.
Here's the article: Sony gave identity theft protection, but not credit card protection.
Get fraud alert!
Me: I already got fraud alert because Sony informed me TWICE (email and on the blog) that it would be a good idea.
What's the point the author is trying to make here?
I'm surprised he's even allowed to post in the comment section, but he's submitting articles? Lol at n4g
This should help you.
Lol at the security firm that gave that number....
"But Forbes cited a study by the Ponemon Institute, a think tank on security, that estimated the cost per person for a data breach is $318." So 318 times 77 million.
A couple critical assumptions that kill that estimate. They're assuming that credit card data was taken and unencrypted. They're assuming that the data on ALL 77 million accounts were taken. They're assuming that the pers...
Seriously!? 24 billion....that's impossible. Did pachter make that prediction? So....this would sink many fortune 500 companies?......total bullshit.
They'll start another faux outrage or claim something is doomed, but they probably won't actually tell us anything about games (god forbid!).
lol
Edit: they will also title the article with a question to make it seem as if they are impartial;even though they've already made up their minds.
Next up: top ten reasons psn is down
Following: "insert game or console" is doomed
Step 3: repeat steps 1 and 2
Both the submitting and bubble system are fundamentally broken....and they do nothing about it