I'd rather just have the artists create their visions than be pressured into checking off diversity boxes for a bunch of virtue signalers. This is a complete and total NON ISSUE that the writer is trying turn into one.
Here's a thought, want more people of color represented in videogames? Then more people of color should go into game development. Because I guarantee you if you had an all black dev studio, you can damn well bet they'd be focused on making videog...
Ridiculous!
Are we sure this isn't from IGN North Korea?
Absolutely!
This is like saying The Godfather Part 2 is better than The Godfather but less memorable. It's probably true. Many regard part 2 as being a better film than part 1 but typically when people talk about The Godfather movies, part 1 is what they're referring to.
PSVR 1 had a 499.99 sku at launch. A 50.00 increase is not that egregious, considering the rise in inflation and how much the tech has advanced.
Honestly my concern with PSVR 2 isn't price. It's the (lack of) games announced for it so far. Call of the Wild and RE Village look great but beyond that, I'm not seeing much else to get excited for. Where's a new Astrobot game? Where's Half Life Alyx? Where's Gran Turismo? A new Killzone VR game or a...
I enjoyed LM3 well enough but honestly, I was expecting more. I want to see Nintendo get a little more ambitious with IP's like Luigi's Mansion. Expand the dev budget for a game like this and increase production value. I want to see LM expand into a true free-roaming "open world" type of game. Break away from the fixed plane level design and give Luigi the same kind of freedom Mario has in say, Odyssey.
When you're calling Scorn your "heavy hitter" you know you've screwed up.
In other news, water is wet.
Because they need it to grow at that rate so they can start making money off of it. Again, saying Game Pass is "profitable" is not the same thing as saying its turning a profit. Too many people are conflating these two terms.
LMAO. Yes, that's why I didn't have much fun with this game. Because I didn't "understand" it.
No but in the modern era, this should not be acceptable for a AAA action/adventure game.
Empty world
Weak story
No dungeons
Uneven dialogue methods (voice acting one moment, text reading the next)
Frustrating mechanics
I could go on but the only thing impressive about that game IMO was the physics.
It was completely forgettable to me. Most overrated videogame in the history of videogames. Take out the name "Zelda" and this game is completely discarded.
Lmao! It's cute that you actually think that.
MS saying Game Pass is "profitable" is not the same thing as saying Game Pass is making a profit. That's just PR speak to appease shareholders. When they say it's profitable, all that means is the Game Pass model shows that a profit CAN be made from it once it reaches a specific number of subscribers at a specific subscription price. However that does NOT mean it's making a profit currently (and its...
The difference in graphical quality from performance to fidelity mode is way smaller than the difference in smooth frames from fidelity to performance though.
No performance mode, no buy! Its that simple for me! Ive been gaming exclusively at 60 and 120fps since this generation started and I am NOT going back to 30! So devs, you can make the "creative" choice to only include fidelity mode but you will not get my dollars!
@Flawlessmic
That's "Xbox logic" for you. The mere fact the game is even there, constitutes a "huge success" in the eyes of Xbots.
I get what you're saying but there's just no excuse not to have this game up and running at 60fps on current gen consoles. That is VERY poor optimization on the devs part and I'm just not going to financially support that.
Speak for yourself. I have been more than happy with PS5.