Would someone kindly explain the disagrees. The xbox exec DID NOT SAY THAT. There was no hypocrisy, no backhanded compliment, only praise for Sony's success across the board. Third party exclusive deals happen. Do they suck? Yes, but it's just business. When Sony does it, even then it's 'Go sony! Give xbox a taste of their own medicine!' Geez, hypocrites and fanboys drive me up the wall
Who are we to tell them how restricted their game should be? If the game they want to make isn't possible on ps4 and xbox one, so be it, but if we begin dictating how advanced a game should be, we're no worse than the corporate suits holding back content to get our money
Hate to break it to you, but he didn't say that. Read the article properly before you think you have an excuse to throw shade at a company you are very clearly biased against.
That is correct. Let's be honest, no game has bad graphics anymore, it's just who has the least good. Of course I prefer gameplay over graphics. Can't believe I got disagrees for suggesting that. If someone can make a game that's amazing and new and worth it, those people are saying they'd rather the game be prettier than it is than get to experience it. It's childish.
The technology involved in this game is astounding. Giving me the online destruction in an open world I thought we wouldn't see for at least a decade! Seeing the gameplay made me so happy, shame people are desperately denying it or downplaying it as easy to do. I can't wait for this game!
I see nothing untrue in that quote. Go on facebook pages before launch of third party marketing deal games and you'll see people asking if it's on another console. Lots of people only see the TV adverts and posters and don't now if it's coming to another console at all.
I also love the way you twisted Playstation's success with third party marketing deals into an insult to Xbox.
No. In the future there will come games that innovate like we've never seen games do before. And when the time comes, if it needs 720p/30fps, so be it. Because I much prefr thriving worlds and enjoyable gameplay than a lack of graphical improvement I will barely notice on screen. I think 60fps should always be put before resolution though.
Why all the disagrees with pro xbox comments? Why the sony fanboys gotta hate. Of course phil is totally all PR and a phony figurehead for a division whose resting all its hopes on one man, but apparently shu the almighty is god of gaming, praise shu, shu is amazing, shu makes playstation I love you shuuuuuuuuu. Hypocrites.
wot?
Yes because Microsoft invested over $15bn in Azure. Sony is a $30bn company. You expect them to justify spending that much to help a few games do more?
Also windows 10 versions of xbox games isn't a 'great unique idea'
Exactly, I'd love a ps4 and it's exclusives, but money is tight. What I don't do is go on ps4 articles and pretend I don't like it or that it's not worth my money anyway. I only started looking at n4g shortly before xbox one announced, and before then my entire life I'd never heard any fuss about resolution or frame rate, but it means so much these days. That and sales. I just wish fanboys on both sides could just see something and say it looks good rather than downpla...
Hate to be blunt, but f*** off sony fanboys, this article is about Xbox, not PS4, stop disagreeing with everyone saying in the SLIGHTEST sense that it's a good console or that it's worth it. You fanboys are pathetic.
You didn't read what I said. I said the only ones released on windows 10 'have a history on PC'. Gears 1 was on PC, therefore the remaster is also on PC. I was implying it will no longer be on PC. Halo 1 and 2 were also on PC
Nope, the competitive tone gives it an 'intensity' that halo's never had before. Since 343 took over, you feel truly powerful as a spartan in there games which is how it should feel, which makes multiplayer so much more fun. Can't wait for halo 5
Of course there's still a need for an xbox one, saying you only need a PC is ridiculous. The only games he's put on windows 10 so far have a history of PC, are a perfect fit or sold atrociously as launch games e.g RTS, F2P, Ryse
You will not see a main halo game on PC. You will not see a main gears of war game on PC. You will not see a crackdown game on PC. Even new risky IPs like Recore and Scalebound are only on xbox one. I get the feeling people want all xbox one g...
I loved Ryse, I think it got a bad rap, it had a good story and cinematic gameplay, which has been paraded as a great design choice for certain other big cinematic games.
Just sayin just cus you're a psn member, doesn't mean you prefer it over live e.g I prefer ps+ value to Xbox live, but I still prefer xbox Network and Console. Just sayin, I agree with your sentiment though.
There is a reason for those disagrees I imagine, and it's that I think you unintentionally managed to annoy 2 groups at the same time.
1. The diehard xbox fanboy who refuses to believe that ps4 has better raw hardware
2.The diehard PlayStation fanboy he refuses to believe that the PS4's hardware isn't relevant to most topics
Bravo, sir, bravo.
I actually don't, I'm just saying if it needs to be a lower resolution, I'd be happy to play it at 720/30 if the game is worth it. Unfortunately many here value graphics more than gameplay, evident by looking at the disagrees