nice, right there u got a lot,
you hit on the point that "PS3 owners dont buy games, they have it for Bluray"
"Halo is Jesus"
"Halo is owned by microsoft, so if that actually happened, it would somehow make microsoft a better company"
nice.
just trying to have some good fun, i dont see bubbles as a problem.
thats exactly what I (and im sure other people) see as the problem, is it ok to be charged just cause u can afford it? when the comptetitor isnt doing so? Sony should charge a dollar for everytime the console is turned on, it seems pretty affordable, sure its worth it, but it shouldnt be done.
fail comment
im sure the ps3 will be able to print out a magic card, which u need to do half the fun things in the game.
its funny how they try to attack PS3 development, new engine for the PS3? thats so sad!, yes exactly what happened with Burnout Paradise amirite?
i know it looks bad, i think the title of this whole thread lets us know that, just pointing out that this 2009 game's "superior" console version looks worse than a 2007 title, dont get jumpy.
hey crab, wasnt greywulf that brought natal into it, it was engadget themselves, just wanted to point that out :)
is it sad that the jeep screenshot shows that even the 360 version looked worse than a warhawk (2007) 4x4
thats funny, cause u took the time to answer at the disagree-ers, i wouldnt talk about being too serious, btw is the game more fun for u now?
this game looks really bad on the PS3 anyway (according to these screens) , and only one group of people are responsible for that.
although i dont believe eyepet is trying to do/be natal, and i believe that if sony developed an interface/application that works like MS's CGI video theyd be able to get it to work, i agree with u on one thing, it did seem confused at once, but I believe its supposed to, because it cant split in two (technically it could cause its fake but its not programmed to) to interact with both people at once. I think its pretty responsive because the trailers show that it is (all done in game), and m...
hey, its the internet.
it seems u beat me to it my friend.
"It's no Project Natal" im guessing he refers to Milo, which was totally legit right?..
I wouldnt disagree with this statement if I saw a live demonstration of Milo that couldnt be easily edited.
its similar, but its actually a type of weapon, its alien counterpart, the version that shoots fire, etc most with tweaks in its model, making them look like what theyre supposed to look like. If u guys looked at the gameplay of this game ud understand, cause at least thats what the devs have said, dont know why some are so eager to take this game apart. still dont know if ill be getting it.
ur statement would be true, if Dark Advocation were everyone.
comment censorship, this is great.
I see it now, next year:
"David Jaffe shows some new gameplay of new PS3 exclusive at Halo-con"
"Many other PS3 games and non related to halo things seen in Halo-con"
"More 'journalists' fantasize that halo took over comic.. um Halo-con"
might as well name tgs the tokyo sony show, microsoft may attend but what the hell right? :)
yeah haze, it wouldve been nice, promises promises. Id also give Sonic the hedgehog to insomniac games.
lol, i was in love with the cgi model from the commercial.