Don't care who makes it as long as it's good, also willing to be surprised like Lords of Shadow games.
I think SE tried to be too smart about this, they thought they could get free ride by competing as a platform alternative to Uncharted4 in 2015 then capture the PS4 audience in 2016. Ironically with Uncharted4 delayed they'll be competing with it directly on the same platform at a time when nobody cares anymore.
Honestly if they knew Uncharted4 was a 2016 title SE would have never made deal, except their plans have now blown up in their face.
I have everything running through my receiver and all the basic PS4 functions like D-pad, accept, cancel work through the generic TV remote.
Your receiver must be CEC compliant for the signal to pass-through.
'Cause HDMI CEC dawg.
It's really sad isn't it, every user of every other platform has critisized things until it turned out better from Playstation going from online passes to none again and Xbox1 with the DRM controversy. But Nintendo...nope absolutely nothing wrong with it.
Quite a lot of new content in this remake.
Shhh don't mention Mighty No9 and Bloodstained getting funds beyond KS, the fans are really sensitive with the fantasy that they are charitable projects funded by fans for fans. That's why you got a disagree.
It would be a pretty crass move, erect a bronze statue, start a new charity with his name sake, but commercializing the death of a figure is a low blow. I'm surprised those fans can't see pass it.
So a project should only get crowd-funding, if it's willing to gimp every available opportunity to get the best possible outcome for the game and customers? In otherwords condemned to begging.
Roger, understood. As long as it fits your ideals.
Did the thought that other people might be "more familiar with the source material" with Shenmue as you are with Yooka-Laylee?
Or does the world revolve around you.
Under CEO Nadella it will never happen, Microsoft isn't a semi-conductor company.
I really dislike judging a game based on the price, if it's great I will pay anything. But there is clearly a correlation between price and perception of value. For instance Valve's Orange Box is one of the highest rated titles on metacritic and you'd be hard pressed to find a review that doesn't praise it for including 3 titles for one price.
The $38 price is from an affiliate. If you want it shipped overseas it's $39 backordered from Amazon.
Is that all you have in your defense, change topic and go for the grammar nazi approach? Nice, I guess the thought that I could be typing on my smartphone didn't occur to you.
BTW I have a PC which I certainly don't waste to just put into gaming, but when I do run my stuff through the GTX780 I choose to run games in 1080p so I don't compromise on latency and waste money on gimmicks
LOL love your downplay of the resolution difference as 'a few pixels', your reasons for saying so could not be more obvious. Perhaps before calling people lemmings you should look up 'biggot' in the dictionary.
Lol no need to reason with a PC fanboy, these days all they talk about are frame rates because consoles have hit 1080p. It's classic goal post moving designed be cynical. For the same reason they'll try to convimce you that everyone has moved on to 1440p and 4k gaming as if it's an industry standard lol.
6db should mean the volume is now half the original loudness.
Both games are download codes, I wouldn't say they would be worth $40 each.
Murphy's law: what can happen will happen.
Honestly with all the exoskeleton type futuristic combat Activision's Call of Duty has been marketing, I would not be surprised if EA is thinking of taking a page from it and answering with their own vision of a future combat game. And if so Battlefield would be their first point of call.
Yes, I keep my old stuff so I can one day laugh at my gaming tastes from a decade ago.