You are lying...I have compared a ton of games on my ps3 and 360 and 95% of the time they are not identical....then you have comparisons from about 4 or 5 different sources often all saying the same thing...you have to be delusional to claim that it is all a conspiracy against the ps3....i know you are a big ps3 fan but face reality...the ps3 does not do particularly well on most multiplatform games.
Come on, Roonie...use some common sense...demos are almost always very close to what you should expect from the full game....Mafia II is about to come out and that means there aren't going to be any dramatic changes between the recently released demo and the retail game.....crashing on the other hand is almost never allowed in a final game....Rage isn't going to be released for over a year anyway. The two situations are not at all equivalent.
That's all opinion....I can't stand when people act like their opinion is some kind of fact that everybody else has to bow down to.
I respect your list but my list would be different...
Best RPG -> Mass Effect 2
Best FPS shooter -> Halo 3 (soon to be Halo Reach)
Best 3rd person shooter -> Gears of War 2
Best adventure game -> Uncharted 2
Best action/hack n' slash -> God of War 3
Best horror/thriller -> Alan ...
Playing any shooter or hell even most action games is worse on the ps3 controller due to the poor L2 and R2.....in fact the D-pad is the only thing I like better on the Ps3 controller....everything else I prefer about the 360 controller.
Yeah...I'm sure we should listen to somebody like you with the name and avatar that you have....you're definitely not a PS3 fanboy.
yes...arstechnica is a respected site....except among radical ps3 fanboys that don't know their @ss from a hole in the ground.....but among the broader technology/computers/videogame s fields arstechnica has always been a respected site.
I just hope the framerate is more stable....there were lots of places where I would get slow down in the first game....other than that it already sounds like they are fixing the controls which was my other problem with the first game...so it should be good.
Halo Reach looks vastly better than Halo 3...which was a pretty nice looking game itself...and now Reach definitely is up there with the best of them when it comes to graphics. it truly is gorgeous... http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Gears 3 and Killzone 3 also look really amazing.
no, it's more like this...
Halo Reach brings:
Amazing gameplay
4 player co-op
Awesome graphics
Great narrative
Firefight mode
A TON of multiplayer modes and features
Forge
Killzone 3:
Pretty good gameplay
Awesome graphics
Mediocre Stroy
Decent multi-player
No true campaign co-op
No Forge or anything approaching it
yeah right...i am getting both, but Gears of War 3 will probably be more enjoyable to me judging by the previous games....I also think Gears of War 3 will probably look better. http://www.youtube.com/watc...
because ps3 fans are acting like dipshits as usual...he is commenting on their poor behavior.
you are full of crap.....he doesn't spread lies or propaganda.....he brings attention to the accomplishments of the 360 brand, which is his job.....the sony execs do the exact same thing....they talk up their product and downplay the advantages of the competitor's product.
it is racist...make excuses all you want....besides the fact that it is complete BS. there are people of every race that can dance very well and there are people among every race that can't dance well...it really comes down to each individual.
I'm a 360 fan and even I agree with you....I never heard Sony or PS3 fanboys say the PS3 was the first console to do 3D.....you also made some good points in your last paragraph.
naw...a Crystek game made exclusively on the 360....now that would look amazing.
Gears 3 already beats anything i have seen on the ps3.....most likely the Crytek game will too.
some people are so ridiculous....look at all the people acting like god of war 3 is the second coming and could never be equaled or surpassed...what a load of crap...it was a great game, but the graphics aren't as amazing as some people are making it out to be and overall it got like a 92 on metacritc....that's a good score, but it doesn't reflect the godhood that these morons allude to.....there have been games that surpassed it and there undoubtedly will be more games in the fut...
saying this game looks like it could be a contender and possibly surpass god of war 3 is now considered ps3 bashing?.....unbelievable....y ou guys are truly insane.
every sensible gamer should be mad at the utter stupidity on display here by ps3 fanboys.....CVG have actually played castlevania lord of shadows and this is their opinion...the ps3 fanboys haven't even played it, yet they all arrogantly proclaim, as if it were a fact, that lord of shadows will be sh!t next to god of war 3....this is why i despise ps3 fanboys....they are so arrogant, hateful, illogical, unfair and dishonest.
kinect looks like it will a lot of fun for parties and casual gamers....it also has a lot of potential that will likely be tapped more and more as time goes by.
Nope...FFXIII was definitely inferior on the 360...there is no debating that....Roonie on the other hand is lying about Dragon's Age...if you go read the comparisons it was found that the ps3 version had certain advantages and the 360 version had certain advantages....for example the 360 version has better anti-aliasing and framerate...the ps3 version had better texture filtering and a better depth of field effect...in any case the 360 version was not washed out.