I have had same girlfriend for 6 years now, and yes I'm still interested in porn games. Well I have always enjoyed a good old monkey spanking, even tho I'm a handsome fellow and had numerous sex relationships and one nights stands in the past, all this changes nothing, I still masturbate at least once a day and most of the time I need some sort of visual stimulant like porn or porn games.
4761d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView commentInappropriate
The article is wrong that's for sure, but your post didn't exactly specify that you meant just a game. :P Even game developers take into account the memory usage of Windows and other stuff people usually have on their computer when they report those memory requirements. :)
My friend had those too, now he is rocking 12 GB and all his random Battlefield 3 hickups are gone, you cant just max settings and have 4 GB anymore. :)
Have to disagree with that, 4 GB is absolute minimum these days, I just few weeks ago gave my friend 12 GB of RAM cause Windows 7 + Skype + Origin + Battlefield 3 can and will eat up that 4 GB easy, and it will cause random hiccups. I would say that 6 Gb is enough for anything games can throw at you, but to be on the safe side I would go for 8 GB if you are a serious gamer. :) And if you do movie editing, rendering or any sort of textures, the more the merrier. I have 32 GB of 2400 MHz just i...
Unfortunately I have to agree with them who say that even PC cant do 4k, I have some experience on that, I have two liquid cooled GTX 670's pumping more power out than a GTX 690, and in some games I can barely do 2560 x 1440 (highest settings) and I can easily do 1920 x 1080 with highest setting available with one exception, I'm looking at you Arma 2! :)
Everyone here needs to know that commercials are made by a different company and if they choose so they will make puns like the one in the famous Butler commercial, so this has nothing to do with what SCE has said about tracking, in fact SCE has been developing motion tracking and depth perception for ages and that technology is bound to come out as PlayStation Eye at some point in time.
Cant agree with that, I sold my "old" computer to my best friend and it had only 4 Gb of RAM and he does easily max it out with Battlefield 3 + Windows 7 + browser with 3 pages. So I gave him 12 Gb RAM and the horrible lag spikes caused by lack of RAM ended. Now he can happily have a browser open game and record the games with fraps. Even tho now his hard-disk drive is a bottleneck.
After christmas I will give him SSD, and then we will see where the next bottleneck...
This is very old myth you are referring to, human eye is capable of receiving hundreds and hundreds of FPS but our brain is incapable of processing all the information and because of this our vision is better at doing some specific things, like noticing a flicker of light in the darkness that lasts 1/220th of a second. That was a test made by pilots. :) So in theory your eye can at least see 220 fps, even tho its just switches between black and white.
@BrianC6234 You are very wrong about the resolution and memory... Memory really doesn't affect that much, only resolution memory really affects is texture quality for example be the texture maps 1024x1024 or 2048x2048 and possibly even affecting how many animations or particles you can have on screen, but the latter doesn't eat up that much memory.
So in short, memory mostly affects quality of the textures.
Sony still ain't in the third place tho, they are second and I'm not trying to pull any "but PlayStation 3 got released year after Xbox 360" card here, now they have genuinely sold more consoles than Microsoft this generation. :)
Well the price is guaranteed to be low, as they have to make it cheaper than you could buy the same hardware and assemble, or consumers would quickly notice how bad of a deal the device is.
"One GTX 690 is little more powerful than SLI GTX 670." That's how I was supposed to write it, didn't obviously check what I wrote there, sorry for that one. :P
"well it is a dual gpu card. Its kile saying they didnt have the 7970 in Xfire or 680 in sli." No and no, even tho it has twice the amount of chips on it, it doesn't mean that its two cards, you can still have 4 way SLI with GTX 690. So GTX 690 is a single card.
Well, to his defense, he has no idea that he is wrong about the fact that PhysX has a way bigger hit on the CPU than on GPU, but Borderlands 2 happens to be very light on CPU so it doesn't really matter there. :)
Only thing there is that they didn't test GTX 690 at all, well yes its expensive, but it is faster than any other card out there. One GTX 690 is little over twice as powerful as SLI GTX 670.
I got this computer so I could play Arma 2 on highest and 10000 view distance, and it still lags like crazy (stupid view distance). I get probably around 20-30 fps in Chernarus.
Man I hate loot system that only drops items for one person, I find collaborating with people satisfying also seeing the loot with your friends is awesome. All I can say is that get better friends.
The article is wrong that's for sure, but your post didn't exactly specify that you meant just a game. :P Even game developers take into account the memory usage of Windows and other stuff people usually have on their computer when they report those memory requirements. :)
My friend had those too, now he is rocking 12 GB and all his random Battlefield 3 hickups are gone, you cant just max settings and have 4 GB anymore. :)
Have to disagree with that, 4 GB is absolute minimum these days, I just few weeks ago gave my friend 12 GB of RAM cause Windows 7 + Skype + Origin + Battlefield 3 can and will eat up that 4 GB easy, and it will cause random hiccups. I would say that 6 Gb is enough for anything games can throw at you, but to be on the safe side I would go for 8 GB if you are a serious gamer. :) And if you do movie editing, rendering or any sort of textures, the more the merrier. I have 32 GB of 2400 MHz just i...
Unfortunately I have to agree with them who say that even PC cant do 4k, I have some experience on that, I have two liquid cooled GTX 670's pumping more power out than a GTX 690, and in some games I can barely do 2560 x 1440 (highest settings) and I can easily do 1920 x 1080 with highest setting available with one exception, I'm looking at you Arma 2! :)
Everyone here needs to know that commercials are made by a different company and if they choose so they will make puns like the one in the famous Butler commercial, so this has nothing to do with what SCE has said about tracking, in fact SCE has been developing motion tracking and depth perception for ages and that technology is bound to come out as PlayStation Eye at some point in time.
Cant agree with that, I sold my "old" computer to my best friend and it had only 4 Gb of RAM and he does easily max it out with Battlefield 3 + Windows 7 + browser with 3 pages. So I gave him 12 Gb RAM and the horrible lag spikes caused by lack of RAM ended. Now he can happily have a browser open game and record the games with fraps. Even tho now his hard-disk drive is a bottleneck.
After christmas I will give him SSD, and then we will see where the next bottleneck...
This is very old myth you are referring to, human eye is capable of receiving hundreds and hundreds of FPS but our brain is incapable of processing all the information and because of this our vision is better at doing some specific things, like noticing a flicker of light in the darkness that lasts 1/220th of a second. That was a test made by pilots. :) So in theory your eye can at least see 220 fps, even tho its just switches between black and white.
@BrianC6234 You are very wrong about the resolution and memory... Memory really doesn't affect that much, only resolution memory really affects is texture quality for example be the texture maps 1024x1024 or 2048x2048 and possibly even affecting how many animations or particles you can have on screen, but the latter doesn't eat up that much memory.
So in short, memory mostly affects quality of the textures.
Sony still ain't in the third place tho, they are second and I'm not trying to pull any "but PlayStation 3 got released year after Xbox 360" card here, now they have genuinely sold more consoles than Microsoft this generation. :)
Well the price is guaranteed to be low, as they have to make it cheaper than you could buy the same hardware and assemble, or consumers would quickly notice how bad of a deal the device is.
exactly, this happens all the time.
"One GTX 690 is little more powerful than SLI GTX 670." That's how I was supposed to write it, didn't obviously check what I wrote there, sorry for that one. :P
"well it is a dual gpu card. Its kile saying they didnt have the 7970 in Xfire or 680 in sli."
No and no, even tho it has twice the amount of chips on it, it doesn't mean that its two cards, you can still have 4 way SLI with GTX 690. So GTX 690 is a single card.
Well, to his defense, he has no idea that he is wrong about the fact that PhysX has a way bigger hit on the CPU than on GPU, but Borderlands 2 happens to be very light on CPU so it doesn't really matter there. :)
Only thing there is that they didn't test GTX 690 at all, well yes its expensive, but it is faster than any other card out there. One GTX 690 is little over twice as powerful as SLI GTX 670.
Yeah I have sli gtx 670 with ultra and the ultra settings are really demanding (ini file trick) settings and I still get 60 fps.
Processor: i7-3930K
Memory: 32GB 2400mhz
SSD: Patriot Wildfire
GPU: SLI GTX 670
I got this computer so I could play Arma 2 on highest and 10000 view distance, and it still lags like crazy (stupid view distance). I get probably around 20-30 fps in Chernarus.
I you like realistic shooter, you should try Arma 2 :P This is no way realistic, in any way.
Man I hate loot system that only drops items for one person, I find collaborating with people satisfying also seeing the loot with your friends is awesome. All I can say is that get better friends.
Care to elaborate?
Quadro post. T____T