KZ4? Hmmm, if Guerrilla Cambridge is behind it I'd be looking forward to it.
I don't think GG can make a KZ that matches KZ2 anymore. Last KZ game I liked post KZ2 was Mercenary, hence why I want Cambridge to take the reigns on the next KZ on console.
This comment is just wow.
I'm sure you don't believe everything you just typed. You're just trying to rile people up, right?
One of the few games prior to it's launch where the more you see, the more impressed you are with what game shows off.
A lot of games this gen show promise early on, but start to show question marks as the release date approaches. Zero Dawn sure isn't one of those games.
Doesn't matter to me. I like Smash's system so if they went the full clone route I wouldn't mind. If they stick with the super-kill-only system I'm fine with that as well, as I enjoyed the first PSABR.
My only real issue with PSABR was the lineup. You put Crash, Spyro, Snake, Cloud, Lara, ect. on there and I think people would be willing to tolerate PSABR's system. Maybe they can go the power stone route or get a dev with creative minds that can go in d...
Dang, need to finish the first game before this come out.
Looks like PD wasn't lying when they said GT Sport was 50% complete(or whatever percentage it was I don't remember). A lot of people gave them heat for it. The improvements look amazing.
Crash being back and Sony and Acti seeming to be in favorable terms, has me thinking about a PSABR 2. Could get Crash and Spyro on there now. Cloud can be there as well given the FF7 remake. The lineup could be a lot more promising this time around.
^^^ Xbox nation everyone...
Looks like they admitted to bias to me...
"Now, don’t get me wrong, I don’t think that Sony has the best first party in the world – when they are able to sell an entire system on the basis of nothing but their own games, then I might be willing to concede that point – but I do think that their first party lineup is great nonetheless, and especially for the PS4"
Don't understand why they had to say this
But If it has exclusives it's no longer a premium version of the current console though. It then becomes it's own separate platform. The purpose of the mid-gen consoles is to offer enhanced experiences over the current ones, not entirely new experiences, that's what a new gen is for.
Again, you can always wait for the actual next gen console to arrive where you don't have to "worry" about the the previous console holding it back if that's your ...
No it's not "impossible" to believe that at all. Devs will figure out how to get more out the more powerful units despite restrictions over time. That's how console development has always been. They are starting off with resolution bumps and/or stable or increased frames for now, I'm sure more apparent improvements will come over time.
If not you can always stick with your current console and wait for the actual next gen console to arrive... like you&...
Darth, there's a third scenario where those who do have a PS4 get pissed off because Sony went back on their word about the Pro not having exclusive games.
Pro doesn't have to demonstrate "all that power" because is not a freaking next gen console. The Pro getting exclusive games will make it an entirely new platform as opposed to a different iteration of an existing one.
Why are you so adamant about there being eventual exclusives for the mid-gen consoles?
If Sony and MS are going to reverse their mandate eventually then they might as well have just gone full next gen from the jump.
Youngindy21,
"People probably did lose interest because in a sea of multiplat first person shooters like COD, Battlefield, Overwatch, etc. Titanfall is just another one"
That doesn't make any sense. So what you're saying is that if you take away the release of the PS4 version, all of a sudden Titanfall is unique shooter and not "just another" shooter and more Xbox/PC gamers buy it?
Something tells me that if ...
Why is everyone saying that game should have remained console exclusive?
Did the game going multiplat really make people lose interest?
amnalehu is correct.
People are treating the Pro like it's a next gen machine. People are acting like the Pro has to make everyone that owns a PS4 feel like they must upgrade today or something.
The Pro is no different than the slim in regards to urgency to upgrade. I don't see anyone saying that the slim is rhetoric and that they're only doing because current gen isn't travel-friendly enough. If anything in Sony's case it actually is ...
"HOLY....are you actually using this as an example of goalpost moving by Xbox fans and not Sony?! 😂😂😂&qu ot;
LMAO
So much for the filp flopping on "both" sides being hilarious I see.
Ignoring all the "I can't wait for TRUE 4k next year" posts I see.
#nextyear
@343
My point is that upon it's reveal the Pro had a lot of negative reactions across the board which spawned articles like the one I linked above. Now upon launch with people with actual hands on experience they are expressing satisfaction or more so with what the Pro offers. Hence exceeding expectations because based off the reaction of the reveal, you'd expect a lot of those who have tried the Pro to be flat out saying it isn't worth the purchase at all.
Would never happen because of the amount of money you'll miss out on had you announced it several months earlier and gave it a marketing push.
Only way I can see something like this happening is with a publisher that doesn't care about money or with a developer that publishes their own game and has the popularity to still move a million units without marketing at all.
Would be cool if it happened though.