Are you a casual gamer?
Yeah, because adding a second analog stick is going to prevent people from buying the system./s
Before the price was revealed for the Vita everyone was speculating $300 it.
So $250 is actually under the price of what most people thought it was going to cost.
I'm not saying $250 dollars is cheap, but when you consider the tech behind the Vita, the price is reasonable.. but a hardcore Microsoft fan like yourself might be too blind to see anything Sony does as reasonable...
I'm guessing it comes out November.
I feel like they should announce the price and release date earlier. September seems too late.
Like xbox fans like to say... what took so long? It took up until 2011 to prove Japan's irrelevancy? Why didn't it happen in previous years?
LOL @ pretending that there would be an actual situation where you'd actually buy a Vita...
There was an actual article that showed that if you combined all the 360 exclusives that are around a million+ and PS3 exclusives that sold around a million+ that the 360 does in fact come out ahead.
As for this article, the reason that makes the most sense is the first one.
"Less is more" is not necessarily true. I seriously doubt that had Uncharted 3 or Killzone 3 been the only exclusive game to "get" for the PS3 that year it would have ...
Just stop trolling. Don't get upset that your trolling comment got marked down lol.
ILoveYou360Fanboys(aka IHateYouPS3Fanboys) strikes again!
Well, to expect the Wii U to match or surpass the Wii sales numbers isn't realistic in my opinion. Nobody expected the Wii to sell that much when it initially launched. 70-80 million lifetime sales would my goal if I were Nintendo.
***"What would make you fork over a cool thousand when the PlayStation 4 comes out?"***
Nothing. I'd wait for the price to drop.
Their argument is that they should delay it so that they can have a better titles to coincide with the launch of the system which is stupid.
Might as well release it now so that those who want to buy it now will buy it now and those that want better titles will buy the Wii U when the titles they desire arrive.
It makes no sense to delay a system purely for more launch titles.
They should just make a naruto rpg...
Fanboys will cling on to anything to trash another system or to praise their own system so no surprise that there are idiots that believed it was true LOL.
Actually, that's how they use to review games in previous generations.
Nowadays most reviewers go on a scale like this...
10- excellent/genre defining
9- great
8- good
7- above average
6- average
5&below- bad / very bad / terrible / horrible / trash / broken
This is the way it is now. That is the truth.
If those PSV numbers are accurate then WOW.
LOL
Thing is, I don't get why people even get into heated arguments about which one is better when pretty much every Final Fantasy pre-FF10-2 were great in their own right. It is what it is.
I thought it was all about the money? Why should Nintendo give a damn about early adopters? Hell, it would actually force a good portion of early adopters to buy the new version thereby increasing sales even further.
Good thing Nintendo is sensible enough to care about early adopters, eh?
Yeah, I know that's more than likely the real reason why Nintendo didn't add it, but you were making it seem as if Nintendo didn't add it because they don't ...