All Channels
Popular

ossyc

Member
CRank: 5Score: 6590

hahahaha LMAO, running 1800P...................the power of the Crapbox One X

-- "Feel True Power"-- it's barely an improvement on the PRO and that's been out 12 months already

3237d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

https://www.scan.co.uk/prod...

Now that's what you call a console, very expensive but crushes any console and you have the king of content delivery............Steam!!

3245d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

It should be a bit more powerful, it's out 12 months after the Pro. Still 30 fps though, ouch!

3247d ago 5 agree15 disagreeView comment

The crappy Jaguar CPU is holding it back on the big titles like Anthem, AC, D2, same as the Pro. I expected more from the X, considering the Pro will have been out 12 months already.

3249d ago 1 agree6 disagreeView comment

I bought it with the xpac for £12 on Steam about a month or so ago. I thought £20 was a rip off.

3258d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'll be playing 60-90 fps Ultra on my 1080TI rig, that's what's funny......you get me?

3259d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment
3259d ago Show

...and yet the AAA games like Anthem / ACreed / D2 are all 4K 30FPS like the Pro

3261d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Crapbox One X is using shitty AMD graphics and a mega shitty Jaguar CPU

3271d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment
3271d ago Show

It will bomb. Gamers with a decent PC won't buy it. I have a great rig and have bought a PRO for the fantastic Sony exclusives. No point in buying the X; same games as on PC and it's completely inferior to a PC.

3272d ago 12 agree19 disagreeView comment

My 5 year-old spare PC with a 680 can run CSGO( Source Engine) 4K Ultra / 150 FPS.

3273d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

LMAO.

3273d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

ROFL.

The X is a great 1080P / 60 machine

3273d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

LMAO, the graphics engine is the Source Engine from 2004, that's why. They'll be saying Pac-Man can reach 16K next.

3273d ago 5 agree20 disagreeView comment

The PS4 PRO will have been out 12 months by the time the X drops and it's technically no better. Lame from Microsoft, I expected much more from them.

3273d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's like saying Pacman on the Atari 2600 matches the quality of Pacman on a PS4 Pro

3276d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The Jaguar CPU isn't good enough. The PRO and X1X are both using it. Also the GPU is good but not good enough. it would need to be the equivalent of an Nvidia 1080 at least, to hit 4K/60fps and you'd have to dial down the graphics to med-high. That card is 9 TFLOPS.

The X1X GPU falls short of the 1070 which is 6.5TFLOP . This is why the the most intensive games like Anthem / ACreed Origins / D2 are 4K/30fps for both PRO and X1X - they are technically very similar....

3280d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Destiny 2 - 4k 30 fps / Anthem 4k 30 fps / A Creed Origins 4k 30 fps. All the AAA intensive games will be the same, of course games with nothing going on like Minecraft, Forza, are zero intensive games, will be 4k 60fps.

The Jaguar CPU isn't good enough. The PRO and X1X are both using it. Also the GPU is good but not good enough. it would need to be the equivalent of an Nvidia 1080 at least, to hit 4K/60fps and you'd have to dial down the graphics to med-high. That ...

3280d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The Jaguar CPU isn't good enough. The PRO and X1X are both using it. Also the GPU is good but not good enough. it would need to be the equivalent of an Nvidia 1080 at least, to hit 4K/60fps and you'd have to dial down the graphics to med-high. That card is 9 TFLOPS.

The X1X GPU falls short of the 1070 which is 6.5TFLOP . This is why the game is 4K/30fps for both PRO and X1X

3280d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment