CRank: 5Score: 123160

Wrong...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/...

How many are going to continue to speak in every article about WW1 who clearly know next to nothing about it outside of a few things they glance over in school.

3573d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Activision doesn't need to make a remaster at all also... So yeah, I prefer the option and I am sure the millions of COD fans who would have bought Infinite Warfare anyway would agree.

Either way how about everyone quits the over dramatic outrage about something they barely know anything about until we get more information. Who knows maybe Infinite Warfare could be a great game also.

People are somehow under this idea they are entitled for Activision/...

3573d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

When did anyone from Activision or Infinity Ward say only pre-order people will get it, or even that they will only "EVER" be the ones to get it, do you have a link?

3574d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

For years now COD season passes have been $50, $110 with game, or $15 each DLC pack x4 for $60. http://callofduty.wikia.com...
COD2 (3x $?? map pack), 3 (2x $?? map pack), 4 (1x $10 map pack), W@W (3x $10 map pack) and MW2 (2x $15 map pack). The other 6 of the core games starting with BO1 in 2010/11 are 4 packs, $15 a piece and $50 for season pass.

So $120 is actually a ...

3574d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well they already have 1942 and 1943. 1944 would make sense and also bring in some nice late war weapons and vehicles not seen in BF before.

3574d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well considering in BFBC:2 they had the first level in WW2, main game modern, and multiplayer expansion Vietnam... It would be great to have a game hit the highlights of every major U.S. war of the last 100yrs or so.

That would leave a lot of room to start with the modern mechanized/industrial warfare of WW1 and go all the way up to Modern or Future Warfare (hypothetical or grounded in reality/known technology).

Probably asking for too much with all that ...

3574d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I agree, have tried to explain it before how good it could be with all the warfare variations and locations.

First thing that comes to my mind when thinking outside of the usual trench warfare is always Rommel (my fav) in the mountains leading his undersized group men on a dangerous raid far behind enemy lines capturing thousands of soldiers without a single casualty. Lol although it wasn't usually that easy for him.

Either way wouldn't be shocked...

3574d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

If the weapons weren't great why did so many remain in use throughout WW2 and some decades after that as well?

Heck some weapons from WW1(and preWW1) were still in use militarily until the 90's, even today but not usually standard issue (exceptions would be guns like the mosin nagant which is still issued) and are still produced for private ownership or only recently stopped production in the last 2 decades.

Let's not forget some of these long...

3574d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

It's not the first time Dice employees have said childish negative comments publicly about COD though.

When BF3 was coming out they came at COD in a similar immature way. Even before that, this thread has some people discussing it around 2011 when BF3 came out. http://www.gamefaqs.com/boa...

I don't believe anyone from the C...

3574d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

It wasn't that bad but just very different especially coming from GTAV. After a while of getting used to it I was ripping all over Chicago barely getting a scratch on my vehicles even in first person view.

But yes improvement would be much welcomed.

3576d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I would also add,

Character animations/level traversing - Smoother and more realistic/natural

Shooting/aiming mechanics - much smoother and more precise feel to the aiming/handling.

Gun sounds/animation/kick- more powerful sounding/feeling/looking, smoother better looking animation.

Weapon wheel/options - being able to use explosives/gadgets without needing to go into weapon wheel, plus feels snappier and easier to na...

3576d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

In terms of the "neo" it shouldn't be a big issue since it's not a generational leap of power. I would say 3 yrs min since most all 3rd party want the biggest audience between platforms. Even at that point it would on be certain games trying to push the limits.

I hope they continue the trend since they obviously made the architecture developer friendly it should only be easier only dealing with new power levels over the years. I believe AMD was in from the...

3579d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sony surely can and will, otherwise the developers games can just not be released on PlayStation systems meaning the developers miss out on millions of potential sales.

Either way so you honestly think it's 2 different versions? So you think they make thousands of versions for all the different PC setups? Even if you did think that what would be the issue with making it run on 1 other setup that's almost exactly the same as the current Ps4 considering the thousands ...

3579d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

That's what happens when you have too many French Cries with a Whaaaaamburger. Makes you gassy and gives you heart burn.

3579d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

I would have to doubt your claims since we are in San Andreas in GTA V so not exactly sure how they would bring that "map" into the game that's already set there.

If you have some kind of info or links it would be nice.

3579d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Cool story bro, felt like I was there...

3580d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

At least it's not DETROIT! It's not DETROIT!

3580d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment
3581d ago Show
3581d ago Show

@brandonb21

Gta4 (April 2008) came out like 6 months after Mw1 (November 2007) and trophies came out months later in early 2009 I believe.

3581d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment