Obelisk92

Contributor
CRank: 6Score: 72700

After playing the game, I can finally say 7 is fine.
Of course to someone it would be an 8, even a 9 maybe, but a 7 is fair too.

2694d ago 3 agree10 disagreeView comment

@princejb134: It's a matter of opinions. You have to admit DS was way more influential though.

@TomatoDragon: I'm not saying Demon's wasn't a good game or it wasn't innovative. I'm just saying Dark was more important to modern gaming due to some designs and mechanics which became standards. But yeah, Demon's came first and it really triggered the most important transformation in modern gaming.

2694d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

@generic Demon's Souls sure was the original idea, but didn't really accomplish what Dark Souls did with its branching open world

2695d ago 1 agree8 disagreeView comment

Why is everyone still celebrating BotW THAT much? Ok, it doesn't track collectibles andd and gives a reason to search for them. I agree that's a good thing, but that's it.

It also has goddamn towers to discover the map, which is kind of ubisoft-ish.

Making an innovative game is HARD and very risky, and major AAA games never tend to risk, people should get over this.

The last big, real innovative game we got was Dark Souls, a...

2695d ago 15 agree16 disagreeView comment

Pure bliss

2698d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

No way man! I'd give this game less than 1.329/5.

1.317/5 sounds fair

2700d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Is this a crossover episode?"

2701d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's the reason, indie games feel way better on the switch... Hollow Knight, Owlboy, Dead Cells, Salt & Sanctuary, I'm picking all of them on Switch for portability.

2701d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

@Neonridr: They did. I checked.

https://metro.co.uk/2017/03...
https://metro.co.uk/2017/10...

BotW "Very possibly the best videogame ever made".

Well, I don't want to go o...

2702d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I missed the sale, damn... Hope it will be discounted soon again.

2702d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

For all the 9s and 10s I saw I was thinking it would sit on low 90s on metacritic, but anyway, this looks incredibly fun.

Can't wait!

2703d ago 9 agree2 disagreeView comment

There's no problem with the score, the problem is this magazine constantly trying to be edgy by giving different (and mostly lower) scores than any other site.

I'd say they're clearly seeking for attention.

2703d ago 7 agree7 disagreeView comment

Of course, I agree. 7 is not even a low score.

And I'm saying that by reading the review, they have legit complaints that justify this score.

So I don't know. I'll be playing this in three days so I'll see!

2703d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

No need to be ironic, The problem is not this particular score.

Slant pulls out low scores all the time. They try to be like EDGE. Failing.

http://www.metacritic.com/p...

2703d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

The opinion looks legit, I don't know.

We'll have to wait and play for ourselves.

2703d ago 15 agree28 disagreeView comment

They downgraded the score on purpose.

2703d ago 12 agree8 disagreeView comment

@UltraNova they have to put a nonsensical decimal in the score, so they can seem "technical".

But in the end, who cares. Looks like the game is awesome.

2703d ago 8 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yes, don't mind them. They're notorious trolls.

2703d ago 4 agree9 disagreeView comment

I expected an 85.

Seems even better than I hoped.

2703d ago 2 agree8 disagreeView comment

Thank you Slant Magazine for feeling ridiculous once again.

2703d ago 21 agree11 disagreeView comment