Troll reviews lowered it, without them it's 93
Wii U is capable of playing at 1080p and 60 fps, but it isn't able of having real HD textures 2k, 4k or 8k res textures, maybe 2k textures on characters but that's it.
Btw COD runs at 600p not 640p ;), it's running at 720p on the Wii U. But I think the Wii U needs to render the stuff on the controller, that's why maybe.
I'm still getting a WiiU it looks interesting and I like nintendo's exclusives.
Stop fighting for minimal graphical differences on console multiplats.
It will, the textures aren't high res and the only resource intesive thing I see on those screen shots are the draw distance and the Ambient Oclussion
Textures need to be improved though. Glad to see they improved the lighting, shadows and draw distance. The Depth of Field effect is in the sweet spot too.
Go cry somewhere else. Just get a Wii U if you want to play Bayonetta 2, it wouldn't exist if it wasn't for it.
Even though I do agree that Apple is trying to compete with the vita and that the iPad IS NOT a gaming machine. The iPad still sells a lot more than the Vita, it doesn't need to catch up, it just needs to use something else for gaming instead of that touchscreen
The Half-life series got a much more enjoyable story. Not hating on Uncharted though.
Jealous much?
I really hope someone continues the darksiders, saints row and metro series if studios get closed
A COD player complaining because a game "has generic MP", when COD is a generic piece of shit, btw COD on consoles can't stay at 60 fps so you got back to the 40-60 fps fail that is COD.
You have no right to complain about SP when COD's SP is terrible
My top 4 goty contenders are:
Borderlands 2
Halo 4
Persona 4 (if it's how i expect it to be)
Guild Wars 2
There may be some bullshit reviews like the 2/10 review or the 7/10 (not the score, it's content!), I'm enjoying this game a lot even if I'm a PC gamer it got it's flaws, like most console games: lack of proper AA, 30 fps, 720p, etc. Those aren't valid reasons to downplay a console game since graphics aren't consoles strenght.
And for what I've played, this game pretty much does good in every aspect: story, gameplay, multiplayer, fun. It's at l...
Not really, a good gaming rig has always costed 500-1200$ if you know where to look, people are stuck in a mentality that gaming PCs are 3k+ because of the overpriced alienwares and what most ignorant people say. And also people think building a PC is hard when it will take you little time.
You're my favorite ranger btw.
I install games on a usb stick, it can bring more benefits than installing it to the hdd if the usb stick is faster.
Even though I game mainly on PC, I have been enjoying halo 4 a lot, the story is a lot better than 3 and reach. The graphics are the best on the 360, even better than gears, even though sometimes the aliasing is too distracting, just like in most good looking console games so I wouldn't blame the game since AA is really resource heavy. The gameplay feels smooth even for a 30 fps game, and it got no hiccups in framerate just like the UC series.
The game is at least a 7/10....
That's a pretty good GPU! Good price for performance
But I would recommend upgrading to a 650ti on black friday, right now is ranging from 100-150$ you'll see a big difference in performance and on your electricity bill! Because the 600 series is a lot more efficient
Weird, with my old GPU it ran at 50-60 fps, notw it runs at 120+. You don't know shit about PC gaming, btw why is a dumb console gamer talking about framerate when most of your games have 20-30 fps, lame.
You're no different than the "elitist pc nerds crying and rage" you're pretty much a sony whore that keeps talking bullshit, the PC sales of most games don't look good because those are only RETAIL sales, most of the PC sales are DIGITAL sales, btw theres more PC gamers than xbox 360 and PS3 gamers.
And a PC version is already confirmed, so the jokes on you.
Moon base alpha FTW.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...