@Imalwaysright
You should change your name to “imnotalwaysright”
Nintendo games have been getting free passes for 20 years now. Some of the older games I agree with can be in the top 20 like say Super Mario World, Link to the Past and Super Metroid because they're the ones that actually helped pave the way for games in a lot of ways. But BOTW didn't do anything that hadn't already been done, and it was even forgiven for its item issues as well as empty spaces; reviewers somehow arguing that the empty spaces were good because...why again? Me...
This is coming from the quest director too...you know the game design aspect from CDPR that was supposed to be well above and beyond everybody else.
So that's how switches are selling so much
A 2.5 is a little low, but a 7 is too high. In no way should copy and pasted games be considered for a passing score. For games that work and don’t have any notable flaws, but are practically the same game as so many other iterations in its series a 5 is fair.
Lol! If true that’s hilarious because it would have been my third switch game, but now I think I’ll wait.
@NeoGamer232
Being too much of the same thing is a valid complaint because it means the value isn't that special at all compared to what came before from the franchise. Why spend money on a game that you pretty much already have? Not saying you can't enjoy games that have minor improvements or even next to no new things, but when talking about reviews/awards and prestige it most definitely should be taken into consideration as a critique against a game.
I wish mobile games bombing would be enough of a reason for companies to stop making games on phones, but sadly that just isn't the case. The fact is they only need so much money to make back the costs. The game can suck to the ninth degree, but the developer/publisher only needs to make so much money off of it because they're so cheap to make.
Oh hell yes!
Well, going by SE philosophy if they have mobile games of a series or console games of series, they'll have the opposite of it in the pipeline as well. I guess we just have to wait until they finally announce the next major TR game.
If anything, the single player part of a game should have more pull than any multiplayer aspect because a single player experience is more universal to everyone playing it and isn't based on who you get matched with or against. Secondly, the multiplayer quality is based on the server load that it can handle. Finally that server isn't going to be up forever. It will close down in 5 to 10 years time and then you'll have a game that lacks an entire mode. I think Halo Infinite coul...
It makes more sense to emulate games that are classics and that the only way to buy them permanently is to purchase them online where unfortunately their prices are gouged through the roof. On that note It doesn't make sense to keep buying the same game just because it's on a new system. If Nintendo would actually combine all their VC games together under one account per user throughout all their systems then it would be much more fair. However, they're on their third console ...
Sure. They never liked EA but they decided to stick with them for 25 years.
Really hope this game puts Metroid back in the stack
I wonder if they feel the same towards a chicken sandwich.
There are games I'd much rather play that have scores in the 78-80 range than the 97+ range these days. Too many recent games in the last 10 years have shown not to be all that great at those levels.
I just like balanced difficulty. Of course that depends on who you ask on what constitutes balanced.
That would be kamikaze for the Japanese developer then.
Only Luca Brasi sleeps with the fishes
If someone makes a mistake like that at a company I'd think they would fired. It probably would have been better to be fired rather than be set back god knows how many years in savings.