@n1kki6
I am not saying that it is bold for you to have an opinion because you did not state an opinion, you stated it in a matter of fact way. I am not attacking you in any way, I just think it is bold for any claim to say that it will be bad for them. I am going to make a not so bold claim and say that I guarantee they turn a good profit and continue the XB brand. Because they actually do have enough purchasers regardless of not the most powerful hardware. It isn't goin...
1) The cloud is a joke
2) That literally is what gaming is about
3) Exclusives so yeah a lot of folks own both.
There isn't a resolutions issue. If you love resolution you will have bought a PS4. If you don't care about res than you will buy whichever one you want to.
The real reason I am reply is to let you know that I think it is extraordinarily bold of you to claim that this is going to be bad for the long term viability. Also check your facts the majority of TV's on the market are 720p because most consumers think HD is HD. They don't understand 720, 1080, 1440, 4k...
They said the exact opposite of what you claim they said. They stated the cloud did nothing for the AI, the AI did not learn at all in anyway.
Now that makes sense, if you have both consoles I can see how that makes a difference on which copy you buy.
You lost me on the rest of it though. I don't think M$ needs any support. They are terrible at making hardware. That being said they don't need support at all. The PS4 and XB1 are both going to do just fine. It just so happens that one is for gaming and one is for a bunch of crap PC's already do ten times better.
cbuc1125
No I get what that side of the argument it saying. They want the most bang for there buck in the graphical department. Got it.
Just want to point something really important out to you, no matter if a movie is HD or SD the core experience is identical. You might see more details but the movie plot and way it plays out is the exact same. So that comparison is not really effective. I am asking about games not TV and movies.
When I play...
I bought next gen to play new games.
I download all my movies so if I can get the 720p for roughly a couple 100mbs more than DVD than I will go for 720p. For movies it is about managing the available space I have remaining. Synology Disk stations aren't cheap and neither are the HDD's to fill it.
Correction, why buy a console if all that matters is resolution and FPS.
Still trying to figure out why resolution matters? Can someone fill me in on when we started playing resolutions and not games. Also please let me know why we are so spiteful as well. XB v PS = A fight neither group will lose or win.
I don't see how if it had single player it would be worth $60. And no, maps should not just be free. I will say that these guys are IMO pretty cool devs, and I think we will see a few free maps here and there. But I would be willing to pay because they add value to the game for me.
Are you guys tracking that he has it on the lowest settings?
Isn't a smart phone a handheld device that you can game on? So no, handheld gaming will exist for as long as games do.
You don't have to do something to know you wont like it. For example I know I don't want to be raped by a bear with AIDS. I don't need to do that to know it's not enjoyable for me.
I know that is an extreme situation but just wanted to make it clear that when people say you have to play it to know, your wrong. Some people just know what they do and don't like.
Who would have fun killing bots? Who would be so dumb as to think "yay I am helpering da team guyz i killed a spectre"? This game was built to be extremely accessible to every skill level. That is great it really is, I prefer a game that is slightly more punishing.
The reason I take issue with this philosophy is that if they are that hungry for sales before the game is even being sold, what will be next? Will it become the next CoD bullshit $2 camos? Buy character s...
I agree. This adds less immersion than if they would have been real players. The AI is easily spotted and posses no challenge. I was really excited for this game to take a break from BF4, but this is just not that fun for me. No news of a HC mode either makes me nervous.
I keep wondering where the new facts are coming from. Did they not state that the cloud was not used for AI?
The AI is dumb because the game is shaping up to be the most accessible FPS in history. And that is fine as long as there is a hardcore mode. Using AI as a filler un excited me a thousand times over for this game.
A 12 year old CoD player can bring his stopie no scope 720 skills into this fame and get shit tons of kills, bot kills. You don't make...
I agree the AI is terrible. I am curious as to where you read the AI uses the cloud. Respawn specifically stated the cloud is not used for AI. Or maybe I just misunderstood what you said, IDK.
Hours of play has no bearing on what I would play for a game. Minecraft has unlimited hours of game play in an unlimited world. Unfortunately I find it boring after the first 5 hours.
So if we begin the trend of saying $20 is what a 2 hour game is worth, should is scale the other way as well? Well this game has 150 hours of game play so it costs $150. See how that makes no sense?
The amount of times I am killed by head shots is staggering. I only play HC and I agree with you every head shot regardless of mode should be a 1HK. But I feel as though something fishy is going on with it ATM because the number of deaths from head shots is just insane.
Thank you for this article author. It was he most revealing and thought provoking article I have ever read. Next time consider breaking this epic read into multiple pages so I can take breaks in between pages. Thank you oh mighty creator of valued content, all hail the author.