There's a huge difference between an argument and a statement.
@Shad0wRunner
I WILL enjoy my super nintendo emulator, as well as my MAME emulator, Sega emulator, NES emulator, media player, "restored" Linux OS, package installers, custom firmwares, bootloaders, backup managers and very soon....restored PSN access.
LOL, you sit there on a PC capable of doing all of those things just as good as, if not better than a ps3, trying to make someone who also has a PC that can do the same that theyre missing out for not using c...
Any "you shouldn't buy this" that focuses on the console instead of the games that are out for it is just pointless.
Also, complaining about the price, then complaining about no PS2 backwards compatibility (something they removed to reduce the price of production and retail price) just seems stupid.
And for the record, it's still there, partially, all ps3's can play ps1 games just fine.
Color me unimpressed.
I'll stick to my high end pc, a platform with TRUE next generation capabilities, not software hacks.
Really, console fanboys arguing over their consoles is retarded.
Flaimbait how? they lied about the graphical quality.
Even if the screenshot is not theirs, they clearly state under it "PS3 demo in-game screenshot which shows blurry and poor textures", and do not state anywhere in the article that the screenshot isn't theirs, they simply leave people to assume that from the tiny username in the corner.
Point being they're palming it off as fact when it's a fabrication, last I checked that's lying....
Okay guys, here goes (finally got in to a match)
Gamersmint image top
Actual image bottom
http://i.imgur.com/8vVbP.jp...
Trolling much?
Tell you what Crytek, i'll tell you if i see any differences once the PS3 version manages to connect to a game >_>
It's things like this that make me glad I have a disgustingly powerful PC.
While I agree the graphics for the PS3 version demo are inferior, the article is downright trolling with the screenshot they're using.
Actually you know what?, screw it, I was going to 720p screencap the same image theyre using in the article to show that they simply took the screenshot before the game was done streaming in the textures, while the game does look pretty bad, it only looks THAT bad for the first few seconds.
i WAS going to prove this, but b...
"But Our Engine Can Be Updated To Those Things"
Do it then talk big, i can SAY that i can make a game that beats every other game on this planet, but until i actually DO it, all it is, is cheap talk.
Carmack says PS3 > * except *MAYBE* 360, but hey if you want to misquote the guy to feel better then feel free.
Actually they're just pissed that MS originally attempted to turn it in to a Bing marketing tool.
I donated $24,600
Guess I'll just have to get that new car some other day ._.
Whoever thinks the PC version will look better than the PS3 version clearly hasn't played a Konami made PC game.
Off topic but.. Love the icon, explosm ftw.
Here, let me fix the topic for you.
Top 10 Xbox 360 Exclusives 360 Fans Hope Are Announced Soon
Newsflash guys, developers are gamers too.
This is stupid, PC graphics have been ahead of consoles ever since the PS1 days, theres no "ahead of ps3 version", it's "ahead of ALL consoles", you tell me a single current game that is available for PC *AND* console, that looks better on the console, and I'll go out, buy that game, bump all the graphics options to maximum and correct your mistake.
Week 1 sales for a region where the games been out just 4 days (at the time the article went live).
Right, that makes total sense.
If you're sick of feeling like this gen's tech is maxed out, stop complaining and buy a gaming PC, chances are it'll run things nicer than the next generation of consoles anyway.
When 360 launched, it's tech (cpu/gpu) were relatively low end compared to gaming PC's of that generation, while it's not as easy to compare the ps3 since it's processors so different, I think all of us deep down know that, regardless of their differences, the PS3 and 360 ...