Remake Blood Omen to get the ball rolling and then give us Soul Reaver.
Except PC...
I completely agree with you! I've been very vocal on Fallout 4 since just a couple of weeks of playing after it released. I came to the conclusion that it's a shallow game with very little depth and Bethesda played it too safe. I can understand that Fallout 4 was created in a vacuum but I hope the split between fans and general disappointment has served as a warning to Bethesda to abandon the old ways of developing their games and do better!
Those who purchase Gran Turismo Sport expecting it to be Gran Turismo 7 will be disappointed. However, GT Sport will find its market and please its fans regardless, but if it were up to me I would have incorporated it into GT7.
If the review is written and presented correctly and the score makes sense then it's all good.
You could start reviewing a game and consider it a 10/10 and score it lower depending on how many major negatives you find.
I think this article is already redundant as Fallout 4 has only received one worthy expansion, Far Harbour.
Definitely!
The UK is different. We don't have men mixing with women in toilets. However, I don't care if people claim to feel like their a different gender even if I agree with it or not. My concern is that my kids might become confused about all this gender-neutral business and start to think that they might be the opposite sex etc.
This is the problem. People will abuse this and claim to be a woman trapped in a mans body (or the opposite etc) and walk into the woman's restroom with the intent of perving on them, little girls included...
In the UK, "gender neutral" restrooms are popping up everywhere. They're already in a couple of universities that I know of and sooner or later they will be in schools. I wouldn't feel comfortable knowing that my little girl is sharing a toilet with a young boy.
Just a waste of money...
I loved it.
Money?
Obsidian created New Vegas with just over a year of development time and perhaps a smaller budget. Bethesda had four-years (excluding conceptual planning), a much higher budget and new technology. Fallout 4 is what they gave us... a good game which fails to achieve greatness, which it should have!
Well said!
Bethesda really dropped the ball on this one.
Fallout 4 could have been so much better than what it is...
It looks really repetitive in my opinion.
This is what Fallout will/has become; "Taming" and making creatures fight, and placing neon letters everywhere, whilst killing anything that moves in a world full of recycled assets, lacklustre quests, with a terrible storyline, one where I barely influence the wasteland and its inhabitants no matter what choices I make along the way. Did I mention a more or less one-way dialogue system?
I can't believe this costs £3.99! It's the equivalent to Oblivion's Horse Armor DLC...
Bethesda made allot of missteps with Fallout 4 and because this tacked-on settlement building aspect is so popular, it's guaranteed to be a much bigger focus in its successor.
Where's the interesting, thought-provoking dialogue (among other things), and why is there barely any use of diplomacy?
I expected more and was left feeling dissapointed and worried for...
If this somehow affects the budget and/or development of Rockstar's next game, then I'm going to be livid with Benzies! Can't a rich man just be happy with being rich?
To all those who say Leslie was a crucial force in developing this-and-that... I believe it was in-fact a team effort and how do we know that he wasn't slacking or making the working environment a living hell?
It looks great! It's a shame Fallout 4 itself feels so last-generation however. You can't polish shit...