We need to continue to talk about this. We also need to discuss in depth Ubisoft's credibility and reputation. Their continued lies have proven them to be incompetent and lazy at the very least. I no longer consider them to be a AAA developer.
I call BS on this PR article. Like Ubisoft would never lie about downgrading it's games? That's never happened right?
I would fix the series if left in my hands.
In theory it sounds okay but it doesn't work out as planned in reality. Sounds like it would be good for Microsoft but ultimately it cost them dearly because of all the games they've lost due to this clause.
MS losing games is bad for their consumers.
Sega Master System parity next please?
It won't get a response but I asked why they suck at coding and optimization.
Please ask why they suck so bad at coding.
It's funny because MS fans kept claiming the parity clause was made up. But Phil just admitted it. MS just needs to drop all of it's bad policies.
Wrong. Graphics matter. That's why there are new consoles. That's why people by killer PC rigs for lots of money.
Yes... if we don't speak with our wallets. Cash is all Ubi cares about. We have to show them the cash they failed to get from us is greater than the amount MS paid them to sell out their dignity.
Ubisoft will do this with all of their future games if we allow them to get away with it here and now.
They still have to worry about that. Until they decide to actually fix the issue and give us full 1080p. They aren't getting anymore of my money for anything less than that.
Irrelevant. It's already proven through performance benchmarks that the PS4 CPU is more powerful than Xbone's. Also their AI code must suck. Needs overhauling and optimizing because Dead Rising 2 could have 7000 zombies roaming about the screen and that's a last gen game. So Ubisoft's code must be horribly inefficient. I'd bet anything that the Naughty Dog team could pull off everything in AC:U in full native 1080p if they were the team doing AC:U. I know that's ...
Why is there no "reply" link for the guy below me? @Knightshade: Visual fidelity has a lot to do with resolution. If you don't believe it... watch a VHS and then a DVD and finally a Blu-ray.
It would look even better with that extra 633,000 pixels worth of detail. The jump from SD (480p) to the lower end of the HD (720p)spectrum is 512,640 pixels. So the gap between 1080p and 900p is actually wider than the jump from SD to the first HD resolution. So no...
Same here. With brand fatigue setting in... they have the stones to not push for the absolute best visuals they can?
It probably is set in stone at this point. Not because it has to be. With the size of the team... they could fix it in time. Ubisoft is lazy though.
I'm sure Ubisoft is just PR BS mode still. They don't want to say it's final yet so they can hang on to the fence sitters a little longer. They hope you won't jump ship if you find out at the day of sale. Just them trying to play damage control.
More Ubisoft PR lies and BS. Ubisoft can no longer be trusted.
Why should Ubisoft care if people debate which version of their game is better? As long people are buying... shouldn't matter. This just lost them sales. Why lose sales just so Microsoft can save face?
I'm sick of Ubisoft's lies and BS. First female characters are too hard for them and now this? They should just come out and admit that Microsoft is giving them a handjob. Why would you even consider making parity when MS is being outsold 3:1? They just lost me as a customer. Preorder canceled.
I'm not. Proof of public protest...
https://twitter.com/Neo_Zee...