That was the only good recent Ubi game. I wanna buy it, but vowed to not support Ubi.
It is Ubisoft, I promised to never buy from them unless they really change their strategy and games. If it turns out to actually be decent I may buy it, but knowing Ubisoft, I feel like it will be pretty meh/bad like the Division.
I saw it coming since the beta. Same with BF:E3.
Ever played Verdun?
What if I am that third type of gamer and still dislike this game? I was never hyped and it turned out exactly as I thought it would.
Take into consideration, that the 980ti is a dedicated card not connected to the CPU and the bandwidth of the card really helps the framerate stay that high. Just like a gtx 750 ti out performing both consoles and it's theoretical performance measured at 1.3 teraflops even though the PS4 has 1.8 tflops. Also, he has one of the best processors which will not bottleneck at all. Finally, the tech in Horizon 3 is apparently much greater than Moto 6. 30fps on a racing game always looks way to...
Yeah, I plan too grab a 2k monitor, but the 1070 set me back $500 so I will have to wait a bit.
There are games made by a single person that works. You shouldn't give a game points because it works.
BossBattle
Consoles also have to process their OS's. You are really giving to much credit for the optimizations. It isn't like Nvidia or Radeon never optimize games or anything right? Typically, by the end of the GPU's cycle, the optimizations can give upwards 25% boost from release drivers.
Remember when the 750ti came out that it out performed the PS4 and Xbox One? That card is technically as powerful as the PS4, yet it played most games bet...
People still think the Scorpio is gonna run 4k on titles like this? I have a GTX 1070 overclocked, and when I plugged it in my friends 4k monitor, it cannot play most new games maxed out. That card is roughly 6.8 Tflops with the OC. Even with optimizations for consoles, the 1070 is still a more powerful and struggles quite a bit. But I play at 1080p at my house and it wrecks everything. If anything, it will upscale, but if they run this at true native 4k @30fps, it'll be pretty bad as any...
Personally, although I haven't played the game in years, I say the defining procedural generated game is Minecraft. First playing the game, I was struck by how every world was completely different every time a world was made.
Many games are made with passion. You never explained why it is important, just that it is beautiful. What in this game, will define future games?
OoT had one of the first well made lock-on systems in a game along with puzzles and exploration in a 3D environment, Golden-eye made Multiplayer the way it is today, SMB, has its own legacy with controls and platforming, Mario 64 basically made 3D platforming the way it is today, OG Wolfenstein was the first true FPS with DOOM refining and...
Most definitely not the most important. But a big leap in procedural gameplay.
DragonKnight
Yes, but it is making so much progress that is shown open to everyone, right now they have a mini verse to mess around in until the the single player campaign is released to distract everyone until the massive persistent universe is ready. The campaign is supposedly coming out either late this year, or early/mid next year, then the persistent Universe, I give another 2-4 years until ready.
Not much of a scam when us backers are watching as it is getting developed. They are making a lot of progress, but they have a lot of objectives.
That was so relevant.
@d0nT wOrrY
Funny you get disagrees for doing the most logical thing. Final verdicts should only be held by your own time that you put into it, not relying on reviewers.
My main reason for not being very excited for it is Star Citizen, otherwise it looks interesting. I will buy it on a sale for sure.
I prefer 1, 2, 3, and 4 over V, but I still enjoy V a lot.
I just buy BF2 on steam for $5 and play that still to this day.