wait does it talk?
damn that is high on the ugly meter.
From what I've seen it looks like typical silent hill, I find it hard to believe it can be that bad. This is only one review though.
Umm I cannot find it in the Jpn PSN, a little help? Where is it?
I can't wait for TGS, these filler non-news articles are getting old.
Nice list I suppose, I just skimmed over it.
[copy of another post I made on another site]
It looks kind of funny, like somewhat decent textures in a very old engine, the lack af AA in the first shot makes it look too much like a ps2 game.
The second one looks better I suppose...
Weird game, I wonder how many people still actually care.
well I sighed a bit when I read that, partially because it is old news and partially because it sucks a bit. BETAs seem harder on PS3 at the moment since a lot of devs still lead on 360. There are plenty of PS BETAs this fall so it could be worse but if this continues next year, well that would be quite annoying...
this is not news, its more crappy blog posts.
Most everything looks nice.
Blood and lighting look great, I want to see more new weapons though.
Crysis is pretty that's all, really the only thing anyone remembers about the game, if you want to make the PC seem like this type of god them give me examples of where the PC excels other than in graphics? Even physics on consoles are getting fairly deep.
90% of the time all I hear from PC only players is how amazing the graphics are, is that all? I would take any console over that, especially with exclusives.
For a console game R2 looks great.
Consoles are simpler, standardized hardware meant to deliver content to its users in an equal manner. This is why games like SW:TFU aren't getting a PC version, not everyone would get the same experience and PCs are so different from one user to the next that optimization is, in some situations, just too much.
Consoles do have advantages y'know...
wtf? stop posting vgwire stuff its so obviously biased and probably written by a 12 year old who should be playing the darn system instead of writing crappy F- worthy articles...
Holy hell people don't compare this to Crysis, that's borderline idiotic.
If you are expecting Crysis on a console this gen (or at the very least this early) then stop clicking on any console related links.
I agree with you, it really just feels like random words filled with hardly applicable "facts" while dismissing competition.
I'm glad they added more color, really shaping up nicely. They have really improved their lighting and other effects as well.
I have already pre-ordered my collectors edition :)
Oh my I think I threw up a little, that was like a poorly written middle school essay.
That couldn't have been written by someone who really calls himself(herself) a gamer.
Very interesting and a good work-around instead of constant tearing. It's obvious 1080p in large scale games just isn't practical this gen but it's nice to see the effort for full HD users.
Really impressive game.
To Graphics Comments:
PSM3 says 360 looks better but PS Magazine US says many said PS3 looks better, along with every preview which says equal or better.
Hmmm 1 review or 1 review + 30+ Previews....
same. but it would be better to use the same track...
possible AA method difference?
yes that is what I said, the point that I am trying to make is that every preview (hands-on) has said equal or better so it is just awkward.
sounds to good to be true so we'll see, gow3 has one serious competitor. I hope the combat doesn't feel as stiff as DMC4 did (to me at least)