Wasn't there only 100 editions every shipped out or something?
You mean Code Name 47? The one before Silent Assassin? If so, no, however, I did play all of the other titles besides number 1, and the Silent Assassin was the worst, Contracts was a little better, and Blood Money was a great deal better. However, that still does not explain the review score. Also, just because I see disagrees on my comments doesn't mean I'm going to care, so there is no point in disagreeing, or agreeing. Also, how can this guy say the previous titles were better when...
The only game I've every bothered pre-ordering is Fire Emblem Awakening, and that's because that's Nintendo's star franchises.
What the hell is up with this review? Everyone, including IGN gave Hitman a higher score than 7, and they had great reasons to, this guy on the other hand complements Hitman, but then insults it, and the score does not make any sense
No, I don't believe CD Projeckt will be bought out. Why? Because as far as I've known CD Red, they've never actually screwed gamers over. I mean look at what they did for Witcher 2. They didn't bother installing a protection, or how that if you buy the newest edition of Witcher 2, or the older ones, you can still download the patches. That's what I call an awesome company, and companies that we are missing these days.
Dude, Killzone 3 was awesome. It had amazing graphics, sound and actually a very compelling story.
Wasn't Homefront a very generic shooter or something?
YOu can give a review based on the features only, and nothing more.
Let's just face it, you are trying to act like your opinion is right, even though the only reviews you mostly look at is IGN and GameSpot's, which is then true. However, I can say that there are other reviewers who do not share the same qualities as the ones you describe.
Not necessarily true. I believe a neutral reviewer is someone who just states facts, and nothing more. Like, COD has a multiplayer portion that is similar to the last few, excepts with a few added features, and a biased reviewer would be like, "O Call of Duty 49 is just like the last 48 in the series, however, now you get a chance to get a pre-order exclusive, which will become purchasable in the years to come; 'Hooray'".
When? Do you not remember the new EA ending, or that survey thing? I personally believe that it was a way to get people to hate them less.
Actually, you're wrong. Right after the events of ME3, the "shitstorm", EA was nominated and actually won the worst company of the year if I can recall correctly. And after that, they started listening to their viewers more. So if shit hits the fan again, EA is truly going to jeopardize their chances of even making titles that are worth selling anymore.
Will journalist stop bothering Nintendo? I mean seriously, they are just trying to catch up, and give players great titles, and not screw over people. Game journalist on the other hand, I've seen post terrible things about them, day after day, just stop posting these articles so you guys can start getting views.
I personally didn't like mouse and keyboard configurations, I mean, sure I could change it, but there were far too many keys in my opinion. But then again, who really cares? It's an awesome game on the PC.
I don't even suggest buying it used. I suggest buying it new for approximately 8 dollars, which is how much I spent on Dead Space 2
Nah man, that totally make sense. I think of Revengence as aesthetics, and combining not only dodging, but also the ideas from Bayonetta in some ways. GoW, I feel is more for the story, and the multiplayer. I'm not doubting the developers overall scheme by any point, but I feel that the overall fighting will be sorted of degraded as compared to GoW 3, but I'm still looking forward to what might happen to kratos.
Stop making useless articles like these. Those two titles are extremely different in a way. The new God of War has been the third 6th or 7th title in the series, thus giving developers overall more practice. Revengence however is a side-story, where developers worked on something that didn't have anything to do with stealth, and more about cutting people up.
I totally agree. I wish however that i was more like Bad Company 1, then 2. 2 Felt like you were given silly scenarios, and the story itself was very forgettable. However, number 1 had a crazy story, and great characterization, where you actually felt apart of Bad Company, and how you wanted to prove them wrong, and get the gold.
I don't personally believe EA will ever do that sort of thing.
Well you got to remember that games normally take the best score from the overall time completion, rather than the overall time it took to complete the chapter/ level. Or that's what I've known so far for most titles, like Vanquish for example.