I paid 314 SEK for early access (+ my GamingPass).
That's around 25 euros, but after 20 hours played, I feel that I could've waited. This game sadly doesn't live up to MY hype.
After 10 hours, I've encountered a couple of bugs, but non game breaking. It's the standard Bethesda bugs that you normally laugh at.
The is a lot of other things that annoys me thou, but more due to very high promises.
The menu system is very bad, no Gamma settings is very strange choice, inventory management is chaotic.
I still enjoy the game, but more because I'm in love with Bethesda games. The more I play thou, the more I wanna g...
Except the IGN has way more weight than the country specific ones, both in reality but also at Metacritic.
You forgot about me and my colleagues. We will use it at work daily. Finally an end to bringing PS5s back and forth.
Or play some 90+ games
Yeah, they put IGN on the PC review instead. Very strange mix of where they put what reviews.
Nope, that's No Man Sky for you.
Would've been 100% the same but playable on your preferred platform.
You forgot the /s and therefore less smart creatures will downvote you.
How does it compare with games like The Last of Us Remake, The Last of Us 2, God of War Ragnarok, Demon's Souls, Horizon Forbidden West, Final Fantasy VII Remake etc?
That's not the point.
Xbox has had many mediocre to good games, but 0 exceptional games which they really need. All the hopes has been put on Starfield to carry that flag, and many of us, Sony-fans as well, would've hoped that was going to happen.
If MS can't give us the Sony-versions of God of War, Last of Us and Spider-Man, by buying up the best studios around the world, how will the future shape.
I will play through Starfield and h...
Doubt MS need to pay any outlet with Xbox in it's name. They have already sold their soul.
You do know that only 2 Bethesda games have lower score than Starfield, right?
That's Fallout 76 and Elder Scrolls Online.
Both MS and Bethesda has probably expectations above 90, and the reviews we see now is not even included the ones MS chose to exclude.
How is that the best part?
Don't think everyone should experience the game? 😏
Like saying that the best part with Last of Us, God of War, Horizon, FFXVI etc is that they don't come to Xbox.
Not even fanboys would actually think that is "the best part".
For me, who main PS5, will play Starfield in 7hours and 43 minutes on my Series X or PC. Do you know why?
Because I'm a gamer who doesn'...
7/10 at IGN and Gamespot.
Let us guess final Metacritic lands low to mid 80?
I paid for 1 month GamePass, and the Premium Upgrade, and will probably be done before the end of September and never look back.
ACG didn't get a copy
Did the same but bought it almost 3 years ago (at release). The game I've played most was Lost Odyssey, and the I've played some Forza, Halo Infinite and MS Flight Sim to see what the buzz been about.
I will happily dust off the X again tomorrow, but not as happy that I've paid 2 years of GamePass for nothing.
No one has made a comment close to being fanboys triggered, until you came. So what's your thought o. The actual topic in this post?
Are you happy that Kato is a part of MS in Japan?
No, you can't explore the full planets. You can explore some zones of a planet.
In No Man Sky, you can explore full planets.
Instead of making a very cool looking Starmap, they could've had a list:
Galaxy A:
Planet A:
Location A, B, C
Planet B:
Location A, B, C
Etc, because that's how limited the exploration is.