Not sure I want to play this game. I keep putting it in my cart and removing it. I don't know what it is.
Back on topic, Nintendo needs to answer all developers in a timely manner. Their relationship with third parties has always been strained at best. They don't realize this isn't the 80's anymore.
I'd love a proper sequel. With more of what we love and some real great replay value.
Lets do this!
My understanding is that 10 million, hell even 30 million is nothing to produce Triple-A games. However, is they are developing Double-A games this MIGHT be enough.
I remember the developers fo Kingdoms of Amalur getting a 30 million dollar infusion while they were working on their follow-up to Kingdoms and this wasn't enough. They had to declare bankruptcy.
Hope this isn't some ploy to stay afloat and then declare bankruptcy.
I have thoroughly enjoyed Wildlands. I find it to be much more focused and better overall game than Breath of the Wild. Alone or with friends its a fun experience. I find it fits comfortably between other military shooters because it adds all kinds of varieties to the missions. This was an excellent first step in what I hope will be a revitalization for the series.
Faded and fading.
The only thing real gamers care about is games. Super specs are meaningless.
If that's your thing, they would have bought PC's and dropped thousands if dollars on that platform.
Just look up your history. 'nuff said.
Reminds me of Power Stone.
But free-to-play = I don't touch it.
Man, hope this isn't some dynasty warriors bullsh!t again.
I want some great Double-A games. I hate indies and sometimes I don't want Triple A experience. I miss the 360 days with a passion. This gen is absolutely lifeless.
Zzzzz
NOPE!
Answer: no.
So? Make it.
Fallout 4 is utter crap. Ill never cold buy anything from Bethesda again unless ive read reviews, spoken to my peers (people i trust) and play a demo. These guys have dropped the ball incredibly.
Wasteland is the better product hands down.
Yup. Hate the dude and whatever he makes.
Youre gonna be broke bro, find another gig.
Dumdass
I only need one good reason and that's GAMES, GAMES, and FUN GAMES.
IF this is the system that has the most fun games and the best exclusives. Thing will sell itself.
Talk of fps and high fidelity fall on deaf ears with me.
I care about gaming. Wherever I can get the best experience, that's where I'll be.
Nothing better to do. They all busy becoming monks. They've all taken a vow of silence to appease the gods to make sure Scorpio makes money.
SO you can understand wy Halo and all their other exclusive ips have been shat on.
When was it not relevant? I love rts
Damn, I had it for the 360. Too bad.
If you are going to have LOTS of content at 15 to 20 bucks each and by content, I mean expansions that add 20+ hours, then YES a season pass makes sense to save a few bucks.
IF your content is going to be colors and characters, then NO. Include everything in the base game. Season passes should be for MEATY EXPANSIONS. Not more guns, colors, bikinis and characters.
These two games are very hard to compare because the more I think about it the more I feel they share similarities.
After all, is said and done I feel Wild Lands is more forgiving to the player than MGS V and the land (where you play), is more varied.
Sure one can argue its a 4 player coop game versus a single player game but you can play Wild Lands entirely solo and your crew (plus rebel reinforcements) basically make you a one man army. Much like MGS V.
...