Why would it being similar to Halo be a bad thing? Maybe in gameplay and visual sytle yes, but there's a lot of new interesting concepts and takes on the FPS genre, which are promising.
Who are the people who seem to think that people changing jobs is news?
I left out the m word as I'm not big on name calling.
EDIT: But you didn't see what I did there :(
It's not a dealbreaker, but it would be nice to see it.
True, it's all speculation.
What would you like to be the next question?
u no like dat?
Thanks for pointing that out. That's a rather trivial mistake, but it happens to non-native speakers from time to time.
There have always been "waves" of games inside a console generation, each wave pushing in the visua department.
Lets see what the next wave wil bring.
But others will be very close as well, Sony's exclusives always looked the best on PlayStation.
It's all about jumping on the CoD hatetrain.
Actually, Activision has 3 studios doing CoDs
I hope so. I'd like to see more enemies you'd fear in games, not just by their looks, but intelligence as well.
I'd rather have no microtransactions and paid DLC (but a proper DLC).
Those are interesting.
It's definately an interesting concept.
Some of the abilities are really tedious (and time consuming) to grind. That's what's keeping me from platting the game.
CoD has always been FPS, and will remain.
No, you must play it online with other players.
But I could see a lot of people frowning (if not screaming haha :D) when they first stumble upon it.
It's definately not something you'd like to see.
Why is being like Halo that negative?