Sexy!
I smell 30fps and jaggies.
Stuff that's already been known for weeks. Terrible podcast.
Reading the title made me wish that call of duty had sharks.
What a waste of time, predicting something so trivial when the game will be out in a few months.
Two terrible writers bad mouthing each other, what a surprise!
Could gamers brains start working so that they can finally figure out that it won't happen? The answer is no, to both questions.
Lasers are lasers, but when it comes down to it in regards to video games and FPS in general, they're still bullets. You've got me thinking with the whole "Stuff that we don't have on this planet yet" line; it'll take a great man to innovate in that respect.
It's two years for IW, and one year for Treyarch. That's how they're able to produce one after the other in such a speedy fashion, with IW's games generally coming out with more polish.
@Sillyace92: Yes, I understand I took the word out of context, but even so, using "Photo realistic" when referring to some worn out and dated engine that will never even reach, say, Halo's engine standard of texture quality in it's lifetime, is just pointless....
And you've "Clearly" missed mine Edonus. You care too much about something that doesn't matter in the slightest. Unless you're a big player within the industry itself, maybe even an owner or co-owner of Valve, IW, or Sledgehammer games, then I don't see the reason to waste time thinking about the "Industry".
Please tell me you've at least played Call of duty 1, it's expansion, and call of duty 2 through 4.
Trailers are only a small taste of what's to come. But I see where you're coming from, and I understand the actual footage from the trailer was a bit scatterbrained, but the story itself seems to have been taken in an interesting direction. So it will either impress almost everyone, or it will impress almost no one. Time will tell, and they've still got time left on the development side of things; so lets cross our fingers and hope they pull something incredible, or close to it. ...
I can try. I remember the pre-orders for Red Dead not being very high at the start either, it was a Western game that we don't get a lot of, so everyone was skeptical but still faith-bound to Rockstar since they create amazing open world games. Word of mouth kicked Red Dead Redemption up to the top for a couple of months, and rightly so. I'm not sure about Max Payne, even though I've loved the series from the start, it never really gained the momentum as say, Halo, or Call of Duty...
He used the term "Photo realistic" when referring to the COD engine. I appreciate his enthusiasm, but when you've only got a year to make a full-fledged game, I can only feel sad for the team that they're still working on Call of Duty; and also hope that they find success in terms of quality in this game.
Your point was to make up a wife, a couple of cliche scenarios, and throw them together in an attempt to... well, there really was no point to anything you said.
This appears to have been taken using an early 2004 0.3 MP phone camera. Consider me intrigued!
You've hit your head more than a few times falling off of your bike there Edonus. You're starting to care about trivial things a bit too much.
Gamers need to stop caring so much. If it ever gets bad, I'll stop buying games, simple as that. There are a million other things to do in life: Read, write, play poker or pool; the list goes on and on. Wait, why the hell am I on this site!
Gravelord, I played them all on the PC, and that has been in "HD" before the term "HD" was ever coined. I hear they were recently released for the Xbox and PS3, but if he wants to replay them on the PC, it's not going to take a top of the line computer to do it these days. They're fantastic, and they're not an 8bit side shooter from 1993 so graphics aren't going to be a problem.