There are people complaining about it on Twitter, Yahoo answers, Gamespot Forums, GameFaqs, Game Trailers, must be fake...
Here's Two Sterling Classics
http://n4g.com/gaming/News-...
I go to destructoid but ever since the Deadly Premonition Heavy Rain stunt I have paid no mind to the reviews just because I don't want to have decided whether the guy is being serious or not. Plus, it's totally bad to the games he does this too. Final Fantasy had some flaws. But 4/10, 4/10, Seriously 4/10. It's a travesty. But it is comforting to know that he gave Deadly Premonition a 10. There's a fine line between baiting once in awhile to stir up a conversation, and constantly baitin...
wow good detective work
liar liar pants on fire
Damn, I have to waste my last bubble on a LOL. Damn. Give me a bubble I wasted all of them arguing.
Did you read the review? It was controversial, in it's tone. Relative to most of the reviewers. And with all scoring it in the top tenth, the couple of 80's stuck out.
You most certainly have a point there. It's not our perspective. That would be comparing it to a review that we wrote or our particular stance on the subject. Which this is not the case. It is relative to the average review score which you can calculate on any meta review site like N4G or metacritic. All of the reviews that I chose deviated from the median score, whether by percentage or points, in a manner which made it stand out.
It's not our opinion. It's just the numbers...
The reviews in question in the article deviate so far from the mean score that they stick out.
Like giving a game with an 85 average a 40 for example. It's not so much criticizing their writing, like you apparently like to do, as it is math.
You're just trying to argue for the sake of arguing.
In the description it says: You always have that review that sticks out like a sore thumb. So, it's not that I disagree, it's that everyone else did so much so that the review stands out.
Who's critiquing? It's a list of controversial reviews.
I actually thought they looked pretty close to one another.
That's probably a pretty good bet. Because in the interview he says that Halo is different gamer than a Gears player. Though, I'm sure they don't want to step on each others toes sales wise.
I can't believe this didn't have 500 reports? People must be to busy playing God of War III. Most of the stuff is true but its a matter of preference mostly.
I think they said not in 2010 though.
When I first played MW2 I thought it looked great. Then I played Battlefield Bad Company 2 and not so much. I think the ingame graphics a year after Bad COmpanys release should be much much better and if the trailer is any indication I think they are. Unless it's all rendered and in that case, prepare to be disappointed when the actual game comes. Some of the pictures you can actually read the engravings on the guns.
Maria Kart?
Honestly, does it really matter what console is more reliable than others. That's not really the point here. The point is that some people are having problems with their system and some of them are finding a direct correlation between that and Final Fantasy XIII.