Manic2014

Contributor
CRank: 10Score: 102600

"Video games were already big during the PS2 era and M$ wanted to steal market share"

Dafuq? Is that not competition? Or MS should of shared the consumers? /s

"They can not risk taking chances on new IPs like Sony does with Naughty Dog"

That's a little true, but recently things have shown MS are investing in new IP's - QB, SSOD (Although not owned), Ori, D4, Project Spark. They do have to step up on that basis but ...

4158d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

@Foxtrot

Phil confirmed in an IGN interview after E3 that Rare are off Kinect working on some existing IP.

4159d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

Notch was not forced by MS to sell Mojang or leave. Read his blog post.

4159d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

So Bloomberg were right, Xbox will be keeping Minecraft on all platforms.

4159d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

I see a lot of gaming sites are missing the fact, WSJ and Bloomberg reported that the deal involves keeping the game on the current platforms as that's were all the revenue is being generated. Hence why the hefty price tag.

4163d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Castillio

If the deal goes through the release will be unaffected, as it states MS intentions are to keep it on the platform, as it will generate a large income.

4164d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

the article states, if the deal goes through Minecraft will stay on the current platforms, including PS4, PSV. So currently the profit generated by Minecraft would continue and hence why $2B buyout is being offered.

4164d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's actually a really good opportunity.

4165d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

@drathv72

It is the exact same thing, Sony purchased those three studios after working with them as a publisher. And as of now currently own the studios.

@foxtrot
The principal is still the same, MightyNoX started bashing MS for buying studios, when Sony does the same thing, despite previously being 2nd party, one of the best studios, Sony has was not built by Sony from the ground up.

4165d ago 26 agree21 disagreeView comment

But doesn't Sony do the same thing? ND, sucker punch, media molecule. All great acquisitions. Can't just blame one company.

4165d ago 39 agree25 disagreeView comment

Can't tell anything right now....

4165d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

No matter what company, you can't really expect them exec's to admit mediocre sales.

4166d ago 131 agree8 disagreeView comment

Thats just from one retailer, they hold around 2% market share. If you read the article they're the smallest retailer selling the console.

4168d ago 6 agree6 disagreeView comment

Doubt MS would need to do that, They own the IP.

4168d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes, They own the IP and trademark.

4168d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

IP owned by MS.

4168d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

To be fair MS do have COD for advertising, Sony have some games too though.

@HappyWithOneBubble
Yeah like sony have not been childish. This ad by MS is noway childish, just a smart tactic.

4169d ago 1 agree15 disagreeView comment

Why are people complaining over the MS viral ad, I have to admit it was pretty clever, knowing it's a big game and a new IP, and advertising some very good deals. This in no regards undermines Sony's ad campaign.

4169d ago 4 agree6 disagreeView comment

Technically they're not violating the deal Activision have with Sony, as this site is advertising "Destiny Fragrance", and the content only advertises the console deals MS have in place. It actually clever.

4169d ago 15 agree10 disagreeView comment

It's gonna fail but at least they're trying.

4171d ago 14 agree6 disagreeView comment