Wow at all the disagrees...i am trying to figure out if it was the MS fanboys upset with me saying it was a fair review (probably not) or if it was the PS3 fanboys upset because i didn't get upset about the review and it pisses them off that they can't make an ignorant comment about it (most likely)
Well you can't win them all. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and i accept this as their opinion.
I wouldn't agree with it but to each their own. Fair review.
Sorry but Bladestar is right. 90% of the multiplats are better on the 360 and COD 4 was built from the ground up for both platforms.
@ Microsoft Xbox 360 - ofcourse you use multiplats. HOW can you compare different games on different consoles? There are so many different variables involved. You need to compare the same game on both systems. Reason is because all the variables are the same, except for the hardware being developed for.
They use the same art dire...
Would someone PLEASE tell HipHopGamer that THIS is how you make a GREAT COMMERCIAL.
This is a commercial worthy of actually being aired during a superbowl.
Good job Sony. Excellent commercial.
Wait a minute - Sony's PSN doesn't allow me to watch movies. So right there the article is a FAIL. And when HHG says "we" have all grown to love the PSN who esactly is "we"? i for one really hate the PSN, as i don't feel as connected to online and online friends as i do with Live. Is using the term "we" the rest of the Sony Droids who think its better than Live? And since the term "we" means that he is including himself...are we to believe that HH...
I think you missed the point - he doesn't need to come up with better insults - he does a fine job with using numbers/facts/links and sources. Which you and the other PS3 fanboys seem to take very personally. Even more personally than making actual personal insults...which seems to be like what you just used along with the other PS3 collective borg mind.
Edit@ Bladestar - easy Bro don't let the Droids get your goat.
I agree - there is NOTHING really on the PS3 sim wise. They do have arcade race games but not for Gear heads. GT5 is the closest the PS3 has but its a demo (that they paid for LOL) and lacks any kind of realism other than the actual racing itself - no tuning or damage of any sort.
Oh don't throw a tantrum. I am entitled to my opinion, or am i not? I guess you too are just trying to assimilate more Droids for your SONY mind.
And i have not played the game yet i have only played the DEMO!!! and the demo is an old build thus that is what i have to base my OPINION off of. And i do think it looks good but there are certain areas that even reviewers have stated that the textures don't look great.
Oh and now its GG can PATCH that!!! LOL ya i gu...
Another Sony spin article to gather up the Tribal SDF so that they can stomp and waive their sticks in the air around the bonfire's flames....
Some people had issues with "lag" or "gun movement response times" and some people just don't like the controls and some people just didn't like the demo - However i would think that the MAJORITY that did play the demo were happy with it.
Hmmm - what a surprise - you want to censor N4G so that no negative opinions about the PS3 and its games make it onto the site.
ok i will
Graphics - Gears 2 beats all of them. (MGS4 looks great as well as i own it but nothing out of this world)
Frontlines fuel of war - 50 players online
And if you think all those PS3 games that you mentioned are all "quality" games...LOL then it is you that is the NOOB.
Fun Factor - Halo 3 & Gears 2 (horde is so addicting as well L4D)
You do know that within the average score on metacritic which is the accumulation of re...
You Idiot - Market share is not the same as stocks...LOL what a really stupid thing to say. Sony is 18.83/share 52.36 high low 18.09 and MS 19.29/share 32.10 high low 16.75 as you can see as of right now MS's stocks are higher than Sony's. Do i really have to educate you on what market share is. Ya i guess i do. market share is a total of the entire gaming market out there. Each console has a certain % of that market - determined by # of consoles sold. So for example - if Sony, MS and Ni...
you might wanna do a bit of research on software/number of exclusives per console, attach rates and sales...i think then you will realize that the 360 is winning in each of those departments.
Here is a good start.
www.metacritic.com - here you can compare the total number of games per console and how many 80+ games the PS3 has and how many 80+ games the 360 has...i think that should answer your "quality" games rant and hopefully cure that ignorance of y...
Na - i have played them both and still feel the 360 version is better.
Well - you don't take me as a very smart guy so i guess i will have to expand on what Mart way saying
Couldn't they have added the content in the game BEFORE IT WAS SHIPPED!!!
In other words - they could have but they want to charge the end user some money incase the game doesn't sell as well as they would like - like all other PS3 big name exclusives...
idiot.
I agree with you that is opinion. However it is FACT that FORZA is a better "SIM" than GT.
"meanwhile ps3 enjoys a full year of gaming."
I agree - too bad its always 2+ years ahead of the current year you are in.
Hmm - i am sure you have a link that clearly shows that the 28 million that MS say are sold are actually "shipped" right? Or is that just another Droid comment that your kind make to try and make it sound like proof. Your fanboyism is not recognized as facts.
Also Sales DO matter as it all comes down to marketshare. The PS3's "AAA" games are far and long between each other. And according to Metacritic the 360 has more AAA games and higher rated games over ...
On another note - after playing the KZ2 demo, i may not be getting that game as quickly as i had once thought, the demo just turned me off a bit and i lost my initial excitement. I am more inclined to play games like FEAR2, SF IV, HALO WARS (so damn addicting) and STAR OCEAN.
care to elaborate..which part. It seemed like a no brainer comment. i didn't act like a sony fanboy and proclaim the review was biased, or that sony paid them, or even that sony owned the site. what really is there to disagree with. please explain or am i to believe they all disagreed for really no reason at all and just for the sake of disagreeing? which is a trait that most sony fanboys do on this site. Disagree without stating why. Like yourself you don't really give a reason...your ...