This is why I really dont like Microsoft - because they effect me even though I have nothing to do with them. I dont own any of their products and never will when they act like this.
Havent we ps3 owners got used to installing games by now? Simular to 360 owners gotten used to switching discs. Why is it still a discussion about these things?
Battlefield ≠ 24 players is one reason.
So stop calling it battlefield on consoles then when its only 24 people! Dice have lost the core of the franchise - the massive battles - when developing it for consoles.
Correct me if I´m wrong but isn´t minecraft (to a large extent) about creating your own worlds (or something) and then share them with other people? If so, how will it work when microsoft doesnt allow users to share their content?
Yeah, I totally agree pedrami91!
What worries me though is the fact that Dice wants to create a battlefield with only 24 players! We´ve already seen that it didnt work in BC1 & 2 and now they want to repeat the same missatake!?
I´m not saying those games are bad, just that they dont give the player a sense of being involved in a battlefield and thats what the title of the game communicates.
The funny thing is that the trailer said "Huge detailed landscapes". That´ll be a blast to play with only 23 people to kill...
Or have they come to their senses and raised the number of players on the console versions?
Sorry. Make that 12 poeople to kill. Unless your a team killer that is...
Isnt 5 hours of cut scenes pretty much? I wonder if and how this will affect the length of the game...
Some people say that Microsoft stops the developer from putting more content on their competitions version of a multiplat. Don´t know if its true though...
10 Gb on a disc year 2011! I´m amazed! This rapid development is really something! Well done Microsoft, well done :P
Planes on a map designed for only 24 people? Yeah, that probably going to be really fun. Fly 1 second, reach the end of the map, turn, rinse and repeat.
I wouldnt base my opinion on whether the game is finished or not on the number of updates but if the released game is worth the price.
It´ll be interesting to see if this will be the first multiplat fps this gen with a single player campaign longer than 5 hours. I hope so, then it might be worth investing in this game. I´m not much for the multiplayer part of fps.
In my book MAG is better than bc beacuse it feels more like a real war. Now I´m only playing MAG even though I own bc2. BC is too much like cod, the feeling of war isnt there, you just run around killing people without any strategy.
So if a game isnt fun and entertaining it isnt a game? I guess a lot of games arent games then...
I´m glad I dont support this kind of business strategy...
If the fps´s gets any shorter there are no more fps´s...
PS3 has a lot of options for watching movies and tv programs BUT ONLY if you live in the right country. The only service I can use is Mubi, I cant even use on demand channels (streamed from internet) because of the slow updates of the ps3 web browser.
I am exclusive! Or am I a timed exclusive?
Doesnt affect me since I very rarely by any DLC, I just dont see any value in it. But I'd be pissed if Sony did this (and had no exclusive games) instead of putting the money towards exclusive games.