Trophies/achievements are inconsequential to the overall game but having a heavy emphasis on a new controller that seems to segment the player from the game,(excludind motion,as I think there could be more progress with it.) That to me seems distracting than innovative unless it's like vita and ps3.
I was thinking of something similar.
That not true,if you've been following ps move Sony talk about 3d cameras.
@ break Sense some 360 guys said the same to discredit ps move. yeah like you vega,kinect doesn't make sense in this game because moving,casting spells ,sword play would be weird at least ps move could work as shown by way they demoed it the navi controls the spells and movement ,move controls the sword. sorry for the double post when try to enter it was acting iffy.
@ break Sense some 360 guys said the same to discredit ps movve. yeah like you vega,kinect doesn't make sense in this game because moving,casting spells ,sword play would be weird at least ps move could work as shown by way they demoed it the navi controls the spells and movement ,move controls the spells.
what,are you crazy ! gears does look phenomenal,while the graphics did improve it took them this long to get uncharted like visuals.
@ maniac
Lies,ps eye sold 10mil and they did have games like anti grav by harmonics, kinectics a fitness game but mostly they had wii type shovelware and they couldn't put ps move on ps2 because of hardware limitation and cost. They did everything right with ps eye but didn't support.
@ Cooper both sega and nintendo had technolgy similar to ps eye,sega had A camera but it wasn't design for motion,nintendo also had a cam for the gameboy, it seemed more of a gimmick than a new way to play games,
copyception.
@ gray wii motion plus is a add-on, Sony all ready demo a 3d camera on the ps2 that did the same thing as kinect.
They could easily do this with ps move,because one of the tech demos they showed was the move acting like a camera.
N64 came after ps1 so it was likely to be stronger and what game prove GC was more powerful than ps2, not resi 4 ,because it only had better effects than the ps2 version .
Zero,that made me laugh,bubs!
Games are not selling well at 60 an increase would likely hurt them further.
That was taken out of context, he meant the leap won't be as noticeable as last gen this one.
No, because microsoft never demonstrated how kinect would work with traditional games that require a controller.
@kon the problem is not that it's optional, it's the fact that you hold something in your hand to move the character , then how do you implement kinect in a convining way to say it is a viable option.
N64 came two years after ps1 and I don't know of a game that prove game cube was superior to ps2.
N64 came two years after ps1 and I don't know of a game that prove game cube was superior to ps2, tech wise yes, game wise no.
N64 came two years after ps1 and I don't know of a game that prove game cube was superior to ps2.
@active
That's not a lilke for like scenario because hacker are not animal that attack out of fear or provocation,they don't need anti-hackers,they need laws to let them know we don't want them tampering in our business.
your comment made laugh ,"wig out”!