I thought the same,after Sony demonstrated ps move I felt that wand base motion could become just as natural as the joy pad.
Yes,I wager one-mililion dollars!
How is that "cherry picking", the only exclusive games to have better sales or gears & halo.
You can change the icons and backround to be more aesthetically pleasing.
Yeah put it in home and give people more of reason to visit.
There is no way you could combine razer hydra and kinect because the razer uses low magnetic waves to understand motion,kinect us ir and a regular camera,which is not high enough in resolution to see it and razer is not illuminated to be used as a marker for kinect.
Ps move does not look like a dildo you're just a perv. @20
I wish they would put in some of these cut out levels.
It's Nathaniel Draak.
How so,when Microsoft launched their console they had the first next-gen system a pretty good market campaign enough third party dev and a excellent online infrastructure.I find it weird some times because I can't say Microsoft got lucky they did a better jod than Sony in preparing their system but I fell Sony did better jod over all in that they had a higher price tag a still developing online and some of their promises weren't kept and managed to close the gap so much sense launch. ...
I don't think the intention was to slow their sales but to be more competitive because there is no low end ps3 model in comparison to the 360.
@bad How is droping in price showing weakness?because their last one was in 2009 and its not like the ps3 just launch,I see your explanation but like I said the ps3 wasn't launched a month ago.
Hey Kotick in the words of boondocks.
@ logic If that's the case then why did Microsoft demo kinect like that for the casuals,I think that kinect was for the core gamer but once they tried making stuff for it and some of the claims not coming to fruition they switch to casuals ,they could have shown its use for core games instead pussyfooting about it being some kind of revoltion,it should have been similar to Sony's way of doing it,show as a peripheral for games first then having homebrew applications .
@...
So they mean similar to this @1:45.
@ 1:09 Is where they give a general idea about it.
Aren't all game engines built on pc and ported to console,why can't they take the pc stuff and put it in a next-gen box.
Those games can't run less than 30fps or they would not run at all and you are only say that because they are weak if the ps3 and 360 had the muscle they would do the same.
@ shaman It makes my point valid because if part of the game is to intense it drops resolution which makes it sud hd,I rather take sub hd at 60fps with bunch of effects than a dynamic resolution just to make 60 frames.
@sher00win99 @ 1:13 it doesn't mention that the original ps3 was suppose to have two cell b.e but its proof that ps3 was going to be alot different than what we have now
@ easy Because Microsoft promoted kinect as the next big leap in gaming.
@zappy How? it sold better,not by much though and excluding the 3d aspect the ps eye could almost do the same thing as kinect.
They removed it for financial reason because it was costly to make the ps3 and have ps2 components on the same board.
They wouldn't need a price cut because the 4gig model is meant for the casual gamer and anything above that is to compete with the ps3 which doesn't have a real entry level machine.