Do you need help with that?
Why doesn't Sony sign the 10 year deal, they can still fight against the merger. If it goes through and Sony haven't signed what sort of deal would they be offered then, if any?
It was meant to have Direct Storage capability for PC's that have that hardware/OS, seems like they fudged that too.
Just ignore those little numbers, they don't mean a thing 👍
Just glad I game solely on PC now, no issues with exclusivity with MSoft/Sony games. Might have to wait a year for some but plenty to play until they drop.
Without any of us being in the know, it might be that Activisions contractual obligations were less than 10 years for Sony/MSoft, they might have a better deal with what MSoft offered. No one will offer life time contracts like this, no one can even say what the next 10 years will bring for the world.
These guys cannot get a break, look what happened after the original Stalker shipped.
But the Steelbooks would survive 😁
It was Atari E.T. cartridges, much bigger scale than a few chucked out from a store for sure
Being over 70 is also a factor.
To me a lot of the sounds were not quite right/missing, almost like it was an unfinished mix.
"They don’t want a deal with an Activision owned by Microsoft."
That has never stopped any business before, Sony/Msoft pay each other already for services/licensing etc.
That was good.
"I guess someone forgot to tell the BG3 devs about scalability."
This, as I have said many a time before, they manage between minimum and recommended PC specs, why is it so hard for consoles. Unless MSoft are forcing parity, which would be stupid I reckon.
Most probably
This could be eye opening
Reckon 12 months on this one.
You think anyone including Ninty will be releasing Switch games in 10 years time? Who would sign that contract?
Well it's a 10 year deal so hopefully this will give Ninty the opportunity to release a powerful console for their next gen/Switch replacement.
Who is complaining? You seem very confused.