Did you see that new Dead to Rights game? lawl. It looked horrible.
Fail post if I've ever seen one.
Yep. Sony owned e3..
meh. Didn't interest my little sister...
"1UP: What do you think about Bayonetta, as a game? Do you think Kamiya is right to follow the Devil May Cry formula so closely?
TI:If I made a similar game as a game I made in the company I quit, people would say, "What an idiot, can't he make anything else?" Well, that is more or less the opinion I have for, uh, that Bayo-something game."
Wow. What a d***.
Now, why is the wii so successful and a game like wiifit sells16mil units in under a year? It's all about the peripherals. People need to be engaged by software and hardware, not just one. This type of experience is a passive one. Do you think wiifit would have sold 16mil units with just software alone-- without the balance board?
This tech is going nowhere. Sony probably already patented motion controls with a cam. Which is why Microsoft doesn't use one, but says you can use you...
" I think thats why so many people are hating on it because it could change gaming as we know it and Microsoft will be leading the way. " /facepalm
It's good to see the PSP Go generate some buzz from the media. I think Natal was more shock and awe than a general interest.
Just goes to show how immersive games will become. The little facial imperfections are helping to build more believable character models.
Xbox fanboys will spin this because they don't want to believe in the reality. They rather be fooled into thinking Microsoft is a company of innovation, and that this will add years onto the already troubled 360 hardware.
Yeah... AFTER Sony launches their superior motion controls, bundled with every PS3 at $299.99. I'm starting to wonder why Microsoft didn't build Natal around a controller, which would be a no brainer -- giving the strength and appeal of the wii. Instead they say that you can use your own peripheral? I'm thinking Sony patented motion controls with a cam.
OT: Milo was fake. Peter molyneux has always failed to deliver. And Natal was just a fancy Eyetoy video presentation. EA even sa...
Uncharted 2 is the most impressive game I've seen.
nvm... too easy
Does Microsoft get a little prize for winning? Is this some new thing, grading conferences? It's a sad profession.
My opinion is that all three had entertaining and enlightening shows. I never felt anybody had a mediocre showing-- even Nintendo had a great show. That's all that matters right?
Did they really say that they maxed out the PS3? Regardless, I haven't seen the game. Have you? Fact is, games like Uncharted 2 and GOW III actually exist and are from actual PS3 developers, not some PC guys who are messing around with the Cell, thinking they tapped it.
Kojima said that MGS4 tapped the Cell, but Killzone 2 comes out and it's another benchmark.
Let's try to talk in this time period and reality or let me borrow you time machine.
Let's not jump so hastily to wild conclusions about things you can't comprehend.
Haha. Epic said that it was maxed out with Gears 2. Not trying to hurt your argument, but similar things were said.
Fight Night looks better than any 360 exclusive.
Yeah. If you like Eye Toy ripoffs...
Eyepet is doing the exact same thing and is doing it now. I don't think he realises that Sony has both Nintendo's and Microsoft's tech at their disposal.
I heard they wanted a motion controller for use with a cam, but Sony had already patented it. The type of interaction promised by Microsoft's motion controls is a passive experience. There is no way of a player being as engaged with a video game without some kind of peripheral en...
Get off my jock. Sony clearly won.
Most games, three new high profile exclusives, superior motion controls, and best in show: Uncharted 2/ God of War III.
Microsoft slid by on Natal...