Liqu1d

Contributor
CRank: 6Score: 69600

People are entitled to an acceptable online service that they're expected to pay for. All you want is people to bend over and take from Nintendo. They get the most free passes in the entire industry.

2749d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Should be $0.

2749d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Switch Online isn't worth any money, it's complete trash. Every thing in the service is compromised and free services offer more.

Cloud saves don't work for every game and there's no guarantee your backups will be kept if your sub expires. There's no alternative to backing up saves.

You only get Classic NES games as freebies and they're behind an online check-in system, the same type of system Microsoft were crucified for wanting o...

2749d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Grow up."

"The only people I know who play fortnight are kids.

The negativity is from ps gamers as it isn't on their system yet. When it is, it will do well, because most ps gamers aren't invested in the fanwars"

Take your own advice maybe.

2749d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

It also got downgraded.

https://www.trueachievement...

2749d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

It's cool that Sony thought ahead in regards to HDR, it's nice not having to buy a new console just for HDR.

2749d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

Because sales is an actual measure of success since it's people who actually payed for the product. Players includes people who haven't spent a dime on the product. "Players" is a vague statistic, you could play for 10 mins and you're a "player".

2749d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

"It did note that “Fortnite” won’t require a subscription to play online and “Arena of Valor” publisher Tencent said its game won’t either."

So Xbox is the only platform that locks free to play games behind a paywall. Seems very anti-consumer.

2749d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Fake. Sony have been pretty clear about there being no crossplay with other consoles.

2752d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

That makes no sense. If name changes were part of 6.00 then it would be there from day 1.

2752d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

@darth No. Insomniac said they could choose any Marvel IP. The most likely case is that Marvel wanted a good story based game on one of their IPs and they knew Sony are the best at that.

2752d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

But Marvel don't need a Microsoft deal. There's zero reason Marvel would be interested in Microsoft making an exclusive, they bring nothing to the table unlike Sony who are known for their expertise in Story games and giving developers freedom. The fact the writer doesn't know who's making The Avengers game and tried to correct it but still got it wrong shows the quality of journalism here. This is nothing more than an Xbox fan begging for a handout from Marvel.

2752d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

@monkey Spider-Man looks better than the original footage so try again.

2754d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

If you don't need an Xbox then it's not exclusive to Xbox.

2755d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Are you a compulsive liar?

2755d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Always funny watching Xbox guys like Pantz straight up lie to defend their plastic box. If you're gonna damage control then at least use facts.

2755d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lara's origin story shouldn't have been a trilogy. The reboot was good as an origin story but by the 2nd game she should have already become the Tomb Raider. Rise of the Tomb Raider was such a colossal disappointment after the reboot, couldn't even finish it because it was so tedious and the story was completely uninteresting.

2755d ago 5 agree4 disagreeView comment

Because EA ruins everything they touch. Dead Space ruined, Skate ruined, Mass Effect ruined, Dragon Age ruined, Battlefield ruined, every franchise they currently support was better in previous installments.

2756d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Woman did fight in WW2, but no where near to extent EA wants people to think, and they certainly didn't fight with prosthetic limbs. Women mostly served in auxiliary roles.

2756d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Another banger. Fake outrage over a puddle can't slow this beast down.

2760d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment