Except the relationship between ubi and Nintendo are closer together than ms and Nintendo...
If they didn't give their studios freedom then why would they be putting a lot of their eggs in the indie scene? SoD2, ori, (publishing) cuphead, etc., along with the delays of crackdown shows in recent history that they are fine with earning less revenue that indies bring while giving games they believe in extra time. Things like lionhead and Scalebound must have had problems so large that dumping money into crackdown is a better option than pursuing those things at the time. For a compa...
Nice b8 m8.
2/22 is a packed date. If a move did happen it won't be because of devolper things, just marketing and sales.
Been doing that since modern warfare. Why stop? All your friends are already there.
Hmm, so Kojima is Normand Reedus and the baby is MGS.
In a way. Apple makes a ton of money keeping things to themselves. However, fortnite is making even more money by opening themselves up.
That's like saying a core Mario game is doing everything right that Mario party got wrong. They are 2 entirely separate games trying to achieve different things. SoT is supposed to be whimsical and relaxing while exploring and having an adventure with friends. SaB is more serious and dark.
So I'm just gonna be support and camp in a corner.
Yeah, it is. Just remember, 4 million+ concurrent BR players. That can absolutely not be over looked. Ninja missed out on 40k subscribers by not streaming for 2 days. At 5 bucks a piece that's 200k dollars. Huge amounts of money in trends and fads. So if the trend is one thing and the consumers opinion is another, trend will probably win out. But that's the thing about trends, they're short term. I doubt people will be playing fortnite 5 years from now but people will be going thr...
I know right? It's not even an exclusive.
So I guess it's true that Sony does make the same game over and over because clearly the Sony fan boys want the same thing every time. Can't stand anything different outside of their genre or preference even it's a camera change. They say narrative and single player is utmost importance but apparently it's not after reading these comments. Gameinformer just did their top 300 games and let the readers do their top 300. Witcher 3 was the voted number 1. Stop bitching about a cam...
Um, yeah, that's how very large companies work.
It's almost as if ms is more concerned about people on their network using their services in any form rather than selling consoles or games. Are people just now figuring this out? Same concept with phones. There's a reason Google bought Android and put that os in every phone, not just their first party hardware Google Pixel. Android os commands the market with 38% of ALL os even beating out windows. MS is doing the same thing Google is doing. Meanwhile Sony is concerned with their cut...
Blocking cross play makes no sense. Look at Apple. The most money hungry company in the world yet even they cross play apps with everyone.
Hopefully with much less puzzles (much too easy which just makes them annoying) and more god killing. I have the blades of chaos and have killed only 1 god but fought 4 at 20+ hours.
Because you need you something better than 4k 60? And if the crypto miners are happy with the cards then there's really no reason.
I'd rather perfect dark before banjo. MS would be wise to let Nintendo use banjo for the possible upcoming 64 classic.
It's printing money, no they're not.
I got my 4 tb 2 years ago for 110. So yeah 250 is way too much. Gonna need something bigger soon though, I'm at 165 games down to the last 700 gigs.