You're basically saying it isn't P2W because the other people are just too cheap to do the same? Makes sense, but not really.
You're paying to keep your potentially powerful character 100% of the time.
Uh, it looks like it is partly pay to win.
- You can play 1 of 4 characters on a 2 week rotation.
-You get to build your character up (better gear) for 2 weeks, then your character gets rotated out (will come back in another rotation).
- But, you have an option to pay and keep your character in rotation.
Anyone who refuses to pay... they have a weaker character when the rotation changes. If you pay, you keep your stronger character. Isn'...
Not that I disagree about Bay... Most of the world love his movies. So, yes is the answer.
Don't say that Tidux has a good track record... then turn around and say take this with a grain of salt.
It is confirmed timed.
http://gamerant.com/rise-of...
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
Right, the only sales they will lose would be Playstation owners who are offended and refuse to buy the game outright.
Personally I'll just get it on PC instead of waiting for it to come out for PS4.
Personally don't see why MS would spend anything for this. Is that $10 million (or whatever) going to gain them that many more systems sales to make up for it? Doubtful.
You must have missed the rest of the video, where that person is shown multiple times and is even called the Scarecrow by Poison Ivy. It is his voice through the remainder of the video.
It is only timed exclusive, so who is to say there would be a loss?
Even if you ignored every score below 50, the game average would still only be 69, not in the high 70s.
Also, if you want to ignore the low scores... shouldn't you ignore the high ones? One even gave it a 95, which seems unreasonable based purely on the length/replayability/price.
Hell no.
If you think so, why stop there?
You wore Nikes in a video? Pay Nike.
You used a Honda in a video? Pay Honda.
No, I don't think so.
Where are you getting the "year" figure from? Just an opinion.
Honestly I think it was it was that long of a duration, MS wouldn't have said something other than holiday exclusive.
General opinion is that there it is simply a timed exclusive, at least covering the holiday 2015 period.
They probably won't have to give it a new name if they go to PS4.
I don't have an issue with giving a game a 4 because it sucks.
But, I do have an issue with consistency. I know the reviews are written by different people, but shouldn't you have some guidelines.
AC Unity was given a 4 by gameondaily. The review tore the game to shreds.
- "poorest entry by a large margain"
- setting uninteresting
- "voice acting is awful"
- broken
- same old sys...
Well he didn't threaten to pull ads, but he did suggest they aren't going to pay for ad space again. It really isn't that big a difference.
If you don't give us a good score, we won't buy ad space from you again... that is not acceptable.
I love satire for any topic. However, I come to this site N4G (news for gamers) for news.
I don't think satire should be included here. At minimum, there should be a "satire" option when posting an article (like they have news, opinions, images, etc).
A lot of people, including me, think we are indeed owed something.
We were told a version of this gamee would be free. That was a selling point of the PS4.
I bet the overall scores would have been slightly higher. Metacritic user scores are always brought down by fanboys. Unfortunately the same can be said about professional (I use that term lightly) reviews as well.
Again, I'm not saying this game is great or anything... just that is generally true.
Not sure why articles like this get approved.
Certainly there was something wrong with his comment. Microsoft has showed no signs of a comeback.
Just because a team hires Phil Jackson as their coach....doesn't mean they are making a comeback. They have to actually show results, which Microsoft has not done.
@Troll, Sony had more exclusives rated 75+ in 2014.
So anyone who says Sony has better AAA titles is not simply a fanboy.
What did MS have last year? 2 of their most-touted titles were severely overrated.
- Titanfall overrated. A multiplayer game with last gen graphics shouldn't have cost full price.
- H:MCC overrated. It should have got blasted just like Unity/DriveClub did for being broken. It is still broken.