For the multiplayer to work, they're going to need to have a separate server for or split out the Xbox One owners.
My brother plays this game a few times a week on his Xbox 360 and there are a lot of hackers dwelling in it, some use crazy wallhacks disguised as "normal" players.
It was an amazing game at it's time. I remember playing the PS3 version at a friend's house and doing 1vs1 quick scope battles.
If they can som...
I'm just showing examples on how I can literally fake owning anything and my very valid points are being disagreed on in a very hilarious matter. No goalposts have been moved my friend, just examples. By your logic, if I never said I don't ownn an Xbox One and showed you that pic, then I guess I do own one. lol
This is the very definition of moving goalposts:
http://i.imgur.com/Wr2wwzW....
Playing on your friend's PS4 is pretty cool, man.
I used to do it on my friend's Xbox One all the time and got to enjoy Gears of War: Ultimate Edition.
http://i.imgur.com/IbTtmHm....
You like my gnasher skills in GoW: UE even though I literally don't own an Xbox One, but I can take pictures of me playing one? I got an Epic triple kill if you're wondering. ;)
...
Bioware is busy developing Mass Effect: Andromeda.
There was a recent leak and it looked fantastic.
@EDMIX
Let's make it official, yo!
https://i.imgur.com/km9Je2M...
--
Anyone can put names on a piece of paper for things they don't own, use Photoshop, and manipulate everything about it. I can do this in a few minutes if I wanted to. I can show you I own NASA like computers and make it so realistic. I just never claim to own something from a company I bash s...
With creative director, Amy Hennig (old Uncharted writer) working on this, I expect the story to be great. I don't know about the gameplay,
it needs to have depth and not be a clone.
We will find out real soon, though.
It's not dying sales wise, but it died as being a highly revolutionizing shooter a long time ago, or just making the best in the series.
Doom
Goldeneye
Quake/Unreal Tournament
Halo
Battlefield
All these did something special to the first person shooter genre and some are still showing some charm right now. I probably missed some.
Maybe Call of Duty will do something really badass once more. Maybe they can b...
Are you sure it wasn't just a government kidnapping, pretending to be Naughty Dog just to get answers from you?
Everything Naughty Dog touches is gold.
No way they're making poorly received games... not with their track record.
And I would love them to always keep the industry fresh. Bring in a sci fi or fantasy styled game with amazing everything. They are capable of raising standards.
No problem, man. A lot of us really do miss the old WoW. Vanilla and The Burning Crusade (first expansion) are considered the best, but when I started, during the 2nd expansion, it still had it's charm. Wrath of the Lich King, the 2nd expansion, was even considered amazing, story wise, because it was like a sequel to the old RTS Warcraft games, the 3rd game directly connecting to Wrath of the Lich King.
I wish you had a chance to play it before it went downhill, but if so...
You don't even understand why the private server even existed.
It wasn't to steal subs, it was to bring back the greatness of what WoW used to be. A time where WoW wasn't as casual as it is now and much more community driven.
Blizzard are just too stubborn and stupid to create Vanilla servers. Private servers are not what made official WoW lose subs, it's the direction it's being taken.
You wouldn't understand because ...
With Hearthstone soon having a Wild and Standard format, I wonder if that becomes successful, would that make Blizzard rethink their strategy to add WoW vanilla servers? If Standard becomes more played than Wild which I'm really sure it will...
But of course not, Blizzard has become some of the greediest bastards. They even gave a "Deal With It" styled statement when asked the question.
I only played WoW my first time in the beginning of the 2nd expansion, Wrath of the Lich King, but even at that time, it was much better than how it is now.
-They made the skill trees very linear and basic.
Each class had 3 seperate skill trees for different styles of combat and you were given points to spend them on skills. For example, in the first row of the Warrior class, under Protection, (the tank path) there would be a skill where you gain like 2%+ arm...
Heh...
If you've seen Xbox One's initial plan with the highly arrogant Don Mattrick, I highly doubt that.
Specs don't matter in the long run.
Did it matter for PS2 and PS1?
It didn't because the games were there and those games were great and iconic.
Now, in NX's case, it might matter a little against current consoles, but it's going to be destroyed by the PS5 and Xbox Whatever a few y...
To be honest, I really would. If they incorporate Super Smash Bros mechanics with Street Fighter's then we can see some unique gameplay.
One example would be a 2.5D planed fighter with no "walls" where two combatants fight to push one to the edge using tradional Street Fighter combos and fighting mixed with Super Smash Bros mechanics. Aerial combat would seamlessly combine with ground combat. Health could be the percentage thing of SSB where if you take damage, ...
lol Hmmm...Septic, edit your post out and delete it while you still can, man...
When you agree and allow the whole statement of "10% for digital trade ins," to pass... logic is that you claim it as acceptable. You can call it a joke, it's still accepting it.
--
The definition of acceptable is:
ac·cept·a·ble
əkˈseptəb(ə)l/
adjective
1.
able to be agreed on; suitable....
If the first disc has as "enough" content to be regarded as a full game then it should fine. They also need to intelligently cut the story and ending a part at a cliff hanger would be terrible practice. I'm thinking of a part, or parts, but I won't spoil anything because there's many here that haven't experienced the original.
I know at it's time span from here to release, it would be somewhat difficult to have part 1 to have content as much as F...
Look at my post under retrogamer below on a better way to do it.
Yea, 10% is more, it's basic math, but still pathetic no matter how you want to phrase it.
0% or not being to trade in is not a joke, just how things are right now.
You would need to sell 10 games to get one. That's more stupid than just keeping the games. If someone bought 10 terrible games than I feel bad for the person in this world with internet.
Als...
Here something intelligent...
If you buy a game digitally for $60, you're allowed to sell your owned digital license to a friend or stranger for $50 in the first month or 2 only.
The publisher gains 40% of that sale, so that's $20 for them and $30 for you.
The license gained from friend or stranger cannot be sold again.
The percentage of how much the publisher gets back can vary from 30% to 50%. This could always be c...
lol I agree with that. I wanna say they should of released it at closed beta to a small number of select players, but that would just get leaked out and I know the developers don't want us to see the leaks.
Hopefully they make it tougher if it turns out to be easy for us. Like increase the number of enemies or their strategy instead of just increasing their health. I dislike "bullet sponging" to be the prime reason something is difficult.
Also h...