I don't know for you but I would rather get the superior version of this tech for 50-75$ more on a monitor you'll look at for thousand of hours and keep for years and years.
Anyone not excited about G sync is either already running 120fps in all his games without a dip or didn't see it with his own eyes. I assume it's a big part of this website since they are all console fanboys.
I really hope it comes to pc, Mods and 4 times the resolution is worth the wait imo.
Killed it for me. I don't want no AI in a multiplayer fps game at all, ever. They need to change it or it's a nono for me atleast.
Future proof can't do 1080p and 60 fps in half it's games. That was standard in 2006-7.
Ps3 released matched high end pc, ps4 barely match mid end.Look how limiting the ps3 is today, can't even do voice chat cross game.
4k is comming big time.
Virtual reality headmount need 1600p/4k for a pleasent vieing experience.
ps4 is build around a beefed out tablette cpu and a mid range gpu from 2011.
This ...
Would you not like all the game ever made be on a single library and you could pick from playing on a desktop to a couch experience?
Free of charge, steam deals and upgrade hardware. Mod support, flexible hardware for the budget and you don't have to deal with proprietary controller/hardware.
Consoles need to die, they are just locked down pc with less features and set in stone in term of advancement. The only reason they are here is to take hostage of a ...
“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.” ― Henry Ford
I got a bit of hands on, maybe 20-25 minutes. It's a gap between controller with sticks and mouse in therm of precision and how fast you can react. Imo it's a step forward for this. Plus more buttons so more options with the control and you can map em all. Try it out before bashing it, I know a lot of you here are diehard Fanboy but I was impressed. As a mouse user I would total...
If you take a look at the first Gif, the pc version look better imo.
I don't know man. 2560*1440 at 60 fps on pc for 7$ or 1080p version on console for 60$ hard choice hard choice lol
destruction is overrated.
Console game run at 30 fps, add the latency from the streaming and the visual quality lost and I don't think it's that big of a deal.
Maybe good for older single player game but beside that..
Ease of use like paying to play online. Or the ease of sue like you can't upgrade the hard drive easely? Or how you have to install your games?
New console have nothing on pc ot steam box really. Beside the 3-4 Ip Held hostage.
Ps4 isn't more powerfull mypoopypants...
amd 270> ps4 gpu.
the cpu is clocker way higher then the ps4's tablett cpu.
and you dont have to pay fees for online AND you get steam deals.
There is many reasons why the sony VR headset won't work and I'll tell you why.
First, the hardware inside ps4 isn't capable of pushing high resolution at a fast pace. Even in 1080p you can count the pixel inside a VR headmount display. They are aiming 1600k/4k resolution to truly bring a good experience to the gamer. The ps4 can barely do 1080p at 30 fps.yet alone 1600p at 60 fps.
Second, Game support. With the pc, people can just mod the games t...
I had ton of fun in l4d, I'm sure they'll do a great job. Probably worth the 7$ I'll pay for it on steam.
Anyone who is into sound know that gaming headset sound like garbage compare to real pair of cans. " feels analogous to wearing a super-high-quality surround sound headset." Feels like a gimmick really.
Here is my two cents on what a single open platform would do:
1. Bigger gamer base. Instead of being locked to being exclusive to a platform with 50-80m Users Dev would sell their game to a single platform of over 600 million users. They could sale more way more copies.
2. Instead of paying fees to Sony/Microsoft every game they sell, being on an open platform would bring more revenue per copy. This is a significant boost considering they lose up to 10$ every...
"New Standard in Gaming"
By new standrad of gaming, you mean standard of gaming from 2007? Their game barely get 1080p 60 fps, most of them have to cut to 30 or cut the reoslution to 900p and that's year one.
They god a mid end gpu from 2011 and the only games worth playing on ps4 is multiplats. dem hype for nothing really.
It will be 45% faster for their APU, for discrete card user I could see 10-15% faster. Cool but not a big deal. Really nothing to get wet about considering it only work with a small portion of their cards witch is a smaller portion of the gpu market on a number of game insignificant for all the games released.
Real deal on tech is 120hz 1440p g sync monitor that have been annonced by asus releasing in Q2. Now that's what I call a significant improvement.
45% is a big big jump, but the thing is only a handfull of game will ever use it and it's only on a really small portion of the gpu market.
Im way more excited about 4k monitor with g sync.
a Tablet cpu in a 500$ console. What a joke. Gaming is all about the gpu horsepower and a 270 is better then a xbone or ps4 gpu + Steam deals instead of paying monthly fees lul
Well the ibuypower one looks good imo. There is actually a choice here for the people buying one so they get to pick what they want compare to a console.