You don't have to do it too...
Agreed with ass creed, never liked it. Story is good but the gameplay (combat) is just way to dull to make me try more then a few hours.
it's actually as ease as copy paste...
here let me show you.
it's actually as ease as copy paste...
it's actually as ease as copy paste...
it's actually as ease as copy paste...
it's actually as ease as copy paste...
Image is sharper on pc and the texture are better too. I guess the pc footage was in 1080p so the gap is even bigger at 1440p I guess. The difference isn't so big tho.
I always feel like video comparison is stupid. Youtube compress the image and the quality goes down quite a bit. screenshot are better way to compare.
Best way to remove blurr is to get a 95hz screen and strobe it and increase the resolution... both are not possible with ps4 hardware so im quite septic about that honestly.
About time. The leading video website is years late on this...
Is there any rock simulator on console!
HA! Master race strike again.
I'm so thorn with this. Nvidia has some bad business practices that are harmful for the hardware industries and bully out the competition, but at the same time they make kick ass product.
Also they overprice their gpu a bit, but it comes with better drivers and a better software support (shadowplay/physix).
I just hope this war (there was always competition but now they added fuel to the fire) because in the end it make better product for us the consumer,...
I agree with you. Ps4 for its time is a lot less powerfull then ps3. Ps3 was a 800$ machine sold for 600 that was equivalent to a high end pc in 2005. Ps4 is a 350$ machine sold for 400$ and is preaty much a low end pc... the leap isnt as big as people expected
Not a single time while playing Titanfall on pc have i said i wish this was on a console... I was too busy masturbating to 1440p
Father__Merrin a 2500k cpu released almost 5 years ago is still faster then the ps4 cpu so you don't really need an upgrade.
I know exactly that it will be 1440p 60 fps on my pc anyway... heuhueuheueh
Video memory(vram) is just there to draw a picture on by the gpu. No matter how much you got does not improve the performance. They can put bigger textures all they want if they can't draw them fast enough it's pointless.
Every year Nvidia and amd offer 20-40% better performance for the same ammount of money, are you high or been living under a rock.
A 750 ti a 150$ gpu is faster then a 580 (550$ gpu at release) from only 3 year ago anc consume like 1/3 of the power.
Shut up really.
video games characters has always has poor hair or been hairless because we can't render them. Don't you think real time destruction that respect physics is much harder then rendering hair?
I've played bf:bc2 and bf3 and destruction is overrated. it takes away map design and trow it into the garbage.
http://www.guru3d.com/artic...
R6ex, please. A 780 ti does 67 fps in 1980*1200...
http://www.anandtech.com/sh...
in high setting in 1440p (86% more pixels then full 1080p) get 63 fps..
"Audiophile gamers may have a reason to celebrate"
Audiophile are not on console tho..
Early acces is just fine. People just have tu understand that its an alpha and alot of things is broken. My most played game on steam with over 400 hours on is an early acces and im really happy with every cent i put in
looks insanely fun.
1080p 60fps have been there for half a decade...