Games built for the ps3 up look identicle on 360.
Games built for the 360 look worst on ps3...
Wow...
Why should I stfu. i'm entitled to my opinion. You may not like it but it's mine. The games plot is filled with mindless plot twist and tons of unanswered omissions. Can you honestly say MGS2 was anythign but a graphic whore's wet dream?
Again, MGS1 is a close 2nd to Mario 64 for G O A T, so I'm not a MGS hater. I just think that the series has been going down hill since it's amazing start.
I believe you feel that way becaus eyou purchase of a ps3 has to be valid...
The story line is complex but it's utter crap.
It is a grown up story line is pretty bad.
Scenerio 1:
Snake is in a air duct, codec goes off. Snake is told to find the head of some army division and rescue them. Snake navigates the base he is sent to and finds said army offical locked away. But wait, it's a reversal of fortune, the army offical he is sent to find is really his half clone brother in disgues. Snake escapes but not before fighting a group of rebal so...
welcome to my ignore list...
Aiming at he sun lmao...
You actually quoted Krazy Ken?
your math is funny...
It was outsold in the US.
It pulled even in Europe
and it sold almost nothing in Japan.
1.7 to about MS 750 or Million.
So how wasn't it ousold?
thanks
Can you show where the ps3 is at 9 million?
And can you show where the 360 sold 8 million consoles?
Or are you pulling this out your arse. Sorry but it didn't our sell the ps3.
How did it beat the 360's first year?
360 shipped 11million first year and sold about 9 million first year.
Sony sold 2.6 million in NA and is aroung 1.5 million in Japan.
I doubt Europe has moved 5 million Ps3's
he ps3 is behind lets deal in facts.
**********
At below
***********
http://ps3.ign.com/articles...
Smell that...
Sony did not sell more units than the 360 in the first year.
It sold 2.7 in the us and world wide it has not yet reached 10 million.
Keep trying please.
My favorite thing about sony is it's spin. Yet they can't spin this in a positive light. They said their sales increased from last year and that Call of duty sold 500K (too 360's 1.6 million).
I jus sold my 360 and will buy a ps3 at the next price cut but Sony just got b*tched slap
More tears about it...
The ps3 was out sold ethis year. Face it.
Us, Uk, World wide.....
Reason 1) The 360 had a lower price point
Reason 2) The ps3 only went on sale in Europe in March
Reason 3) The grounds gain did not begin until Much of the year was over and the $400.00 ps3 was released
Reason 4) When the ps3 out sold the 360 is was not enough to make up for the 3 month head start in Europe, the poor sales in Japan(...
Did you caculate sony's manufactoring expenses for all of their consoles? Your math sounds like Sonydefenseforce.com math.
@ above ---
Prove it!! Prior to the price reduction in July it was getting hammered in all regions except Jpn.
Remember It launched in Europe in March so Apr - Dec( it surpassed he 360 in sales per month in july.
Facts remain, the 360 sold more consoles than the ps3 this year.
face it.
The framerate on ps3 ports are bad. Thank you, it all makes sense now.
The RBG limitor is on and that causes jaggies, poor texture qualities and framerate issues.
Your tears hide the truth. GT is against you. Ign hates the ps3 and gamespot has been paid off. Only you know the truth about the ps3 and what it can do. Only you can save the world from M$' lies. Cry and cry until the world is safe. Cry like little b*tches. Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhh
Your analogy is terrible.
You are not squezzing a superior system into the smaller system.
The superiour system should be able to handle everything the lesser system can do. If the xbox 360 is the weaker system, the ps3 shoudl be able to do everything it can do and more. When the game is built from the ps3 down should looks worst on 360. You guys have a warped perception of reality.
@ below------
It's simply logic
If console A can por...
Bawwwwwwwww Bawwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!
Why are you crying over something this small? If GT was the only source for comparisom then this would be an issue. However, we have countless reviews showing the opposite. If you don't want to watch the videos then read the reviews that tells you the same thing. The texture work and FPS on the PS3 is usually worst.
To make matters worst, you first ps3 game designed from the ground up as a ps3 game first ( Burnout Paradise) looks ...
Yet last gen you paid 120 for a ps2 hdd.
40 dollars for a memory card and 40 dollars for a new controller.
Did I mention your network adapter to go online was 40 dollars( after the dreamcast came with a free one) Humm.... I guess you are right, only MS straps the consumer up the arse...
Gametrailers aren't the only ones saying the games look better. You have Ign, Gamespot and all of the other review sites telling you which looks better so far.
Who do i trust,
Ign, gamespot
or
Some random forum guy complaining about the smallest difference of the same game on two different consoles. Just let it go, is a blad of grass really worth all of this. Show me a review of a game that looks better on the ps3 that was released this fall. Things are no...
The bottom line is...
It's 720p vs 720p and the playstation 3 still loses. Stop using this as an excuse. Texture details will not increase like you want it to by moving to 1080p. The ps3 is losing (for now) when comparing it as you would for settings that 75% of all HDTVs are restricted to. The fact is poly count, chracters on screen and texture quality is tumped.
If you can't beat them.....buy them out!
Lol...
Bubbles for you sir. It's simple math that these guys can't fathom.
To narror the gap you need to be making progress not losing slower.
Example.
You fall in quicksand. If you struggle you will drown in 30 mins.
If you sit still you drown in an hour. Either way you're drowning.
Maximizing your time doesn't keep you from drowing. You aren't making progress against not drowning. Find a way to get out the damn quicksand.
Sony...