The ps4 version wasnt gimped. The PC was. Wonder why that could be? Maybe the company that paid for the exclusive content and advert package?
No im talking about the reason why the assets and effects were still in pc game but not used. It only took a few lines of code to turn them on. So ur telling me that last gen caused that? Come on man. The dude returned the game to its previous version in one day. And there was even some effects in there that weren't shown in the previous build? And that gets left in there and not turned on because of last gen?
But its running at a higher fps then the ps4 from what article says. And most of the stuff he states about xbox occurs on pc ultra rigs as well from the reviews I've seen
I agree with most of the article... but watching some videos online showed alot of screen tearing on PC as well so I dont think its just xbox. Total Biscuit has a grade A setup and he found alot of tearing in his experience too. His video is on his youtube if u want to check it out. He also had alot of pop in.
Either way the 2 have never really diminished my experience. And frankly most console games I have played on either lately have both suffered from it. Hell I've bee...
Damn I want this game to be good. With those graphucs and good story and gameplay. .. has the potential to be an innovative game.
Um every os version of every os is essentially a reskinned version of the previous one with a few updates. Thats how it is on mac os, iOS, android, web IS, very rarely do u get anything completely revolutionary because it involves completely scrapping the previous GUI and code , if anything windows 95 was the only revolutionary os out of all the ones I just listed
Yea cuz MS is the one that caused parity on games. Sony is to blame for what watch dogs was. They are the reason pc got gimped. Considering they had the giant multimillion dollar deal with Ubi and not MS
http://m.neogaf.com/showthr...
Actuallt they did say that. They said the console was so good that people wojld get a second job just so they could be able to have one. And then they rode that 600$ for a long long time. Ill look up that quote and post back later for you guys if I remember. But yes it has. There's an entire thread on gaf dedicated to ceo arrogance, the vast majority have come from sony
This article is completely relative. I have owned every major console since the super Nintendo minuses the Sega Saturn. At no point in those 2 decades did I feel like I was heard or cared about. The only time that has happened is with the xbox one. Hell they have a website to vote on what you want added to the xbox experience. And some of that stuff has already come to fruition. Id even argue that the 360 had this same feeling as well. Considering how it defined the multiplayer online experi...
@Steezo bahaha
I agree ... everything you have said is flat out wrong
but if you had played so much of the game that wasnt in the demo maybe you could tell us more about it. because that demo was definantly not last gen. Id say that demo was at least 3x better t h an any of the cod games on 360 that i played. And i played them all. Or do you even buy CoD? Or are u just some hipster that loves to trashanything that millions of people love because your awful and can't carry above a .75 KDR?
If anything the only gameplay change they should back is take it back a few years. Ghost multiplayer was awful. Worst I've played. That has to change. Thats what people buy the game for. Some buy for single player. But tens of millions buy for online. Im sure they know that
Quit complaining about the frame rate of a demo over five minths out. Especially if you have know desire to own said game. They have plenty of time to optimize. Also take into account it was the single player campaign. CoD has always run slightly less frames and spikes during campaign. Also if you watch the frame rate video... over 75% of those spikes came in cut scenes. That is not going to affect me in my CoD experience
No you play the game as it is built for the One without a connection. The other stuff that the cloud will provide will be stuff that the console can't handle. Your looking at it like they build the game for the one and then take 30% and move it to the cloud. Thats not how its gonna work. Stop with the exaggerations and fear mongering. Your scaring the children with your lies and deceit
Seriously tho your talking about a very small amount of people thay aren't. Sony said said 95% of there users are online. We didnt have this conversation when games like CoD were made tailored to Live users. Why is this any different? Why should they sacrifice the improvements of tech and enjoyment of millions just to not piss off the maybe 100000 that arent connected? Especially if it can be a scalable to where the non connected users can only do as much as the cpu can handle. It is 201...
Truth is the number changes because it depends on what time frame from now ur talking about. Since it wont be Up to customers to upgrade hardware, theoretically it could expand more and more as the variables increase (MS server upgrade, land line band with Increases, programming capabilities developing, and more). That would explain alot because if you say 7 years from now what will the power be its a hard thing to peg down. Consider if they do prove its worth and capabilities how much comp...
Yup how dare MS make thay Xbox One Launch Exclusive implement something into that uses the kinect. Completely segregated the people that didnt have a kinect from being able to play the game without. Next thing you know Halo will make you use the dpad to fire to keep the 360 owners from using rumble triggers(who cares if they cant start bluray disc.... we need to think about them) /sarcasm
What scale are we going to use for it. Are we talking just the launch or gen as whole? Is it based on the sales of the 360 launch says life long sales? If its just launch 62000 doesn't seem to hard to beat.
Its ridiculous to think one thing will save a console for its entire life. People wanted to say that Mario kart 8 would save the wii. Yea it greatly improved sales but people arent going to buy the Wii 2.5 years from now because of MK. It is always a cumulative group ...
Dude many of execs have "lied" about there product. In this case it would be revealing issue that they were planning for later. Thats not unheard of. /nosarcasm. I wouldnt be hurt by that white lie that hurt no one. On another note hundreds of CEO have been caught living about products for a great many number of products. In the long run PR is hard to manage, plans for future product, hopes for future product, all while not wanting to disappoint when "shit happens".
See this is the thing, they never a aid you couldn't teade games. What they said was that traded in or traded to friends would require a fee tore license the game. $10 is what was being tossed around. The whole purpose being so developers and publishers could still get paid for there work. Now thos said this wouldnt have been done without alot of backing from the major publishers. Which is why people within the industry felt that Sony would have had to been part of the same push by publi...