jwillj2k4

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 94230

Responding to your post to me.

Prior to launch

Sean literally went on television and said the only way you can see yourself is if someone else runs in to you. But that would be incredibly rare. Then he goes on to say it’s a shared world so if your friend destroys one planet, you’ll be able to see those changes in your game, which was another lie.

These were the reasons we bought it for $60.
Here’s a reminder in case you weren’...

468d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

Even as you wrote your post, you’re contradicting yourself lmao..

Everything was absolutely NOT at launch.
One of the biggest lies was “no two people will ever meet, however, if they did go to the same location, you would see each other”. This got me and my coworkers buying this at full price. I think it was around two hours after the game came out that the people proved he was lying.

468d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Good for them, but this is not the model we want to continue following. A bunch of empty promises and lies at launch. That being said they didn’t take to blaming the reviewers and self-pity. They buckled down and fixed their game. Good on them.

469d ago 8 agree9 disagreeView comment

6,6.5,7

475d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

Witcher 3 like.. in that it sucks

476d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Please elaborate, what “future” does a remaster of an already polished and playable game on current consoles create? It is not a remake, nothing but the shinyness of the rocks, better effects and newer assets have changed. The story remains the same.

476d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

They are trying to maximize profits.

Fully support backwards compatibility with new games being made for both ps4 and ps5.

“Believing in generations” and wanting you to pay for remasters of games that dont need it.

@Cacabunga said it best they are literally in a bubble making games for themselves. They need to clean the slate and remember how they got in this position in the first place. It wasnt by regurgitating up and eating sloppy s...

476d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Just make a good game and the rest will take care of itself.

477d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Boring, repeating mechanics

478d ago 8 agree21 disagreeView comment

Mfs still wouldnt play it 😂😂

478d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

In other news cold water is colder than hot water.

482d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Lmfao yeaok

482d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Whatever he says they do the opposite

482d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

This is the funniest response ive read in a while i love this site 🤣🤣🤣

483d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

“Xbox” games lol…

Attempting to create demand where there was none.

Buying the well thet was once free and expecting us to be grateful for selling water back to us.

Yaok

484d ago 9 agree2 disagreeView comment

Thank goodness. Let this title lay in an unmarked grave.

486d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

You said absolutely nothing to help your argument. As I’ve stated before, they should raise their prices if it’s not sustainable. The tech for how it works doesn’t matter. I am paying to play don’t limit how much time I have just increase the cost to cover it. Keep in mind all of this Is for bleeding edge of people who have this kind of expendable income.

What’s the more acceptable message to a user of this caliber?

“Due to unforeseen cost, we are going ...

487d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Don’t invalidate someone’s opinion just because you don’t agree. And don’t act like a victim just because I’m calling you out on it.

487d ago 6 agree15 disagreeView comment

That’s the whole point of the subscription, smart guy. I’m paying for that rental already. Raise the price up if you need to, but don’t tell me how much time I get to play I’m not a child.

489d ago 13 agree1 disagreeView comment

It’s because they know the game is trash. It’s going to be ”decent” at best 6.5/7 out of 10.

490d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment