All Channels
Popular

jimmins

Contributor
CRank: 21Score: 220100

Yeah, good point ;)

Still. Well done. Finally.

5810d ago 15 agree4 disagreeView comment

Is what it says in the article. But you only read the title... soooooooooo.

5814d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Collectively, the staff have over 150 years of industry experience? Maybe that's it.

But then, you didn't read the article, did you? And you certainly didn't see all of the top developers and publishers who contributed to it. Instead, you just posted your ignorant trolling.

Round of applause.

5814d ago 1 agree5 disagreeView comment

Because you're only looking at the stuff on N4G. And let's face it, N4G doesn't bother clicking on the good stuff.

Put an in-depth games™ feature up there or anything that's remotely sensible and no one clicks on it. So really you're just ranting at N4G, not NowGamer. If you go to the actual site, you'd see that the stuff that makes it onto here represents a miniscule amount of their content.

People click on shite stuff on N4G, so the ...

5814d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

A blog, dude. Chill.

5814d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

A site can only put up what the publisher supplies them. It's not the site that's at fault in the case of bullshots, it's the publisher.

5815d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. You can't win an argument with an idiot, so I'm not going to even try.

All the best.

5816d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Of many, many years experience in the industry,
for one thing, the notion of reviewers beign paid off by games publishers is a load of bollocks. That never happens.

Secondly, games are not rated against each other across genres. Do you think someone plays Forza Motorsport 3 and then when it comes to writing the review thinks, 'Yeah, it's good, but how does it compare to Pokemon?'.

Games aren't rated on size, they're rated on how g...

5816d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

An instruction manual is to give people an idea of if a game works, the purpose of a review is to inform people whether it's any good or not.

But you're right, a review is just one person's opinion.

5816d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

...I would buy it day one. As long as I didn't have to prance around like that guy at E3.

5817d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

...Crackdown 2 is here instead.

5817d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

Maybe they should consider a new purchase though - if inFamous 2 is a hit

5818d ago 21 agree1 disagreeView comment

Looking forward to getting plenty of new info on inFamous after all the recent buzz around the gameplay footage...

5818d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Gameplay looks awesome, awesome, awesome. Could be the best sandbox super-hero game yet...

5819d ago 44 agree4 disagreeView comment

Love the visual design of this game. Can't wait to play it - looks dark as hell...

5822d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

?

5822d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Best first party 3D fighter ever?

5823d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

So no Kinect-powered hadoukens then? boo.

5824d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Since I work here - at NowGamer. Post-E3, not much going on in the world of games and since we get paid to sit here in an office from morning 'til evening, we have to write something. So, we're just doing some lists to fill the time. It's all just for fun, really. ;)

5824d ago 6 agree5 disagreeView comment

But to me, broken is broken... if a bug - esp. in multiplayer - allows cheaters to gain advantage, that's broken. If in single player, it's a potential game-ender; that's broken.

5824d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment